Sign in
GenomicsbioRxiv
Preprint

Extensive gene duplication in Arabidopsis revealed by pseudo-heterozygosity

Benjamin JaegleiD, Rahul PisupatiiD, Luz Mayela Soto-JiméneziD, Robin BurnsiD, Fernando A. RabanaliD, Magnus NordborgiD

Abstract

BackgroundIt is apparent that genomes harbor massive amounts of structural variation, and that this variation has largely gone undetected for technical reasons. In addition to being inherently interesting, structural variation can cause artifacts when short-read sequencing data are mapped to a reference genome. In particular, spurious SNPs (that do not show Mendelian segregation) may result from mapping of reads to duplicated regions. Calling SNP using the raw reads of the 1001 Arabidopsis Genomes Project we identified 3.3 million heterozygous SNPs (44% of total). Given that Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana) is highly selfing, we hypothesized that these SNPs reflected cryptic copy number variation, and investigated them further. ResultsThe heterozygosity we observed consisted of particular SNPs being heterozygous across individuals in a manner that strongly suggests it reflects shared segregating duplications rather than random tracts of residual heterozygosity due to occasional outcrossing. Focusing on such pseudo-heterozygosity in annotated genes, we used GWAS to map the position of the duplicates, identifying 2500 putatively duplicated genes. The results were validated using de novo genome assemblies from six lines. Specific examples included an annotated gene and nearby transposon that, in fact, transpose together. Finally, we use existing bisulfite sequencing data to demonstrate that cryptic structural variation can produce highly inaccurate estimates of DNA methylation polymorphism. ConclusionsOur study confirms that most heterozygous SNPs calls in A. thaliana are artifacts, and suggest that great caution is needed when analyzing SNP data from short-read sequencing. The finding that 10% of annotated genes exhibit copy-number variation, and the realization that neither gene- nor transposon-annotation necessarily tells us what is actually mobile in the genome suggest that future analyses based on independently assembled genomes will be very informative.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.