Completing the ENCODE3 compendium yields accurate imputations across a variety of assays and human biosamples
Jacob Matthew SchreiberiD, Jeffrey A. BilmesiD, William Stafford NobleiD
Abstract
MotivationRecent efforts to describe the human epigenome have yielded thousands of uniformly processed epigenomic and transcriptomic data sets. These data sets characterize a rich variety of biological activity in hundreds of human cell lines and tissues ("biosamples"). Understanding these data sets, and specifically how they differ across biosamples, can help explain many cellular mechanisms, particularly those driving development and disease. However, due primarily to cost, the total number of assays that can be performed is limited. Previously described imputation approaches, such as Avocado, have sought to overcome this limitation by predicting genome-wide epigenomics experiments using learned associations among available epigenomic data sets. However, these previous imputations have focused primarily on measurements of histone modification and chromatin accessibility, despite other biological activity being crucially important. ResultsWe applied Avocado to a data set of 3,814 tracks of data derived from the ENCODE compendium, spanning 400 human biosamples and 84 assays. The resulting imputations cover measurements of chromatin accessibility, histone modification, transcription, and protein binding. We demonstrate the quality of these imputations by comprehensively evaluating the models predictions and by showing significant improvements in protein binding performance compared to the top models in an ENCODE-DREAM challenge. Additionally, we show that the Avocado model allows for efficient addition of new assays and biosamples to a pre-trained model, achieving high accuracy at predicting protein binding, even with only a single track of training data. AvailabilityTutorials and source code are available under an Apache 2.0 license at https://github.com/jmschrei/avocado. Contactwilliam-noble@uw.edu or jmschr@cs.washington.edu
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 47
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Zero-shot imputations across species are enabled through joint modeling of human and mouse epigenomics
Jacob Matthew Schreiber, Deepthi Hegde, William Stafford Noble·ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB)Peer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2020
- The ENCODE Imputation Challenge: A critical assessment of methods for cross-cell type imputation of epigenomic profiles
Jacob Matthew Schreiber, Carles A. Boix, … ENCODE Imputation Challenge Participants·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2023
- PREDICTD: PaRallel Epigenomics Data Imputation With Cloud-based Tensor Decomposition
Timothy Durham, Maxwell W. Libbrecht, … William Stafford Noble·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 11, 2018
- Multi-scale deep tensor factorization learns a latent representation of the human epigenome
Jacob Matthew Schreiber, Timothy Durham, … William Stafford Noble·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2020
- Learning a latent representation of human genomics using Avocado
Jacob Matthew Schreiber, William Stafford Noble·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2020
- CANDI: self-supervised, confidence-aware denoising imputation of genomic data
Mehdi Foroozandeh Shahraki, Abdul Rahman Diab, Maxwell W. Libbrecht·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2025