Frequency and Phase Correction of GABA-Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy using Complex-Valued Convolutional Neural Networks
Hanna BugleriD, Rodrigo Berto, Roberto Medeiros de SouzaiD, Ashley D. HarrisiD
Abstract
PurposeTo determine the significance of complex-valued inputs and complex-valued convolutions compared to real-valued inputs and real-valued convolutions in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for frequency and phase correction (FPC) of GABA-edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) data. MethodsAn ablation study was performed to determine the most effective input (real or complex) and convolution type (real or complex) to predict frequency and phase shifts in GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS data using CNNs. The best CNN model was subsequently compared to two recently proposed deep learning (DL) methods for FPC of GABA-edited MRS. All methods were trained using the same experimental setup and evaluated using GABAs signal-to-noise ratio and linewidth, Choline artifact, and by analyzing the reconstructed final difference spectrum. Statistical significance and effect size were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Cohens d respectively. ResultsThe ablation study showed that using complex values for the input represented by real and imaginary channels in our model input tensor, with real (conventional) convolutions was most effective for FPC. For the comparative study, the simulated data test set showed that our CNN model that received complex-valued inputs with real convolutions outperformed models it was compared against with a lower mean absolute error (p<0.05). For the in vivo data test set, our model performed similarly to other DL FPC models. ConclusionOur results indicate that the optimal CNN configuration for GABA-edited MRS FPC uses a complex-valued input and real-valued convolutions. This model outperformed existing DL models on simulated data and performed similarly on in vivo data.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Field percentile
- top 20%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Frequency and Phase Correction Using Convolutional Neural Networks
David J. Ma, Hortense Le, … Jia Guo·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2021
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Spectral Registration Using Deep Learning
David J. Ma, Yanting Yang, … Jia Guo·Journal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingPeer-reviewed·Jul 4, 2023
- Model-Informed Unsupervised Deep Learning Approaches to Frequency and Phase Correction of MRS Signals
Amirmohammad Shamaei, Jana Starčuková, … Zenon Starčuk·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2022
- Advancing GABA-edited MRS Research through a Reconstruction Challenge
R. P. Berto, H. Bugler, … A. D. Harris·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2023
- GABA-Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Deep Learning Quality Assessment Framework
Hanna Bugler, Roberto Medeiros de Souza, Ashley D. Harris·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2026
- Modelling inter-shot variability for robust temporal sub-sampling of dynamic, GABA-edited MR spectroscopy data
Alexander R. Craven, Lars Ersland, … Renate Grüner·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2024