Estimating Effect Sizes and Expected Replication Probabilities from GWAS Summary Statistics
Dominic HollandiD, Yunpeng WangiD, Wesley K Thompson, Andrew Schork, Chi-Hua Chen, Min-Tzu Lo, Aree WitoelariD, Thomas Werge, Michael O'Donovan, Ole A Andreassen, Anders Dale
Abstract
Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) result in millions of summary statistics (\"z-scores\") for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations with phenotypes. These rich datasets afford deep insights into the nature and extent of genetic contributions to complex phenotypes such as psychiatric disorders, which are understood to have substantial genetic components that arise from very large numbers of SNPs. The complexity of the datasets, however, poses a significant challenge to maximizing their utility. This is reflected in a need for better understanding the landscape of z-scores, as such knowledge would enhance causal SNP and gene discovery, help elucidate mechanistic pathways, and inform future study design. Here we present a parsimonious methodology for modeling effect sizes and replication probabilities that does not require raw genotype data, relying only on summary statistics from GWAS substudies, and a scheme allowing for direct empirical validation. We show that modeling z-scores as a mixture of Gaussians is conceptually appropriate, in particular taking into account ubiquitous non-null effects that are likely in the datasets due to weak linkage disequilibrium with causal SNPs. The four-parameter model allows for estimating the degree of polygenicity of the phenotype - the proportion of SNPs (after uniform pruning, so that large LD blocks are not over-represented) likely to be in strong LD with causal/mechanistically associated SNPs - and predicting the proportion of chip heritability explainable by genome-wide significant SNPs in future studies with larger sample sizes. We apply the model to recent GWAS of schizophrenia (N=82,315) and additionally, for purposes of illustration, putamen volume (N=12,596), with approximately 9.3 million SNP z-scores in both cases. We show that, over a broad range of z-scores and sample sizes, the model accurately predicts expectation estimates of true effect sizes and replication probabilities in multistage GWAS designs. We estimate the degree to which effect sizes are over-estimated when based on linear-regression association coefficients. We estimate the polygenicity of schizophrenia to be 0.037 and the putamen to be 0.001, while the respective sample sizes required to approach fully explaining the chip heritability are 106 and 105. The model can be extended to incorporate prior knowledge such as pleiotropy and SNP annotation. The current findings suggest that the model is applicable to a broad array of complex phenotypes and will enhance understanding of their genetic architectures.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Beyond SNP Heritability: Polygenicity and Discoverability of Phenotypes Estimated with a Univariate Gaussian Mixture Model
Dominic Holland, Oleksandr Frei, … Anders Martin Dale·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 19, 2020
- Estimation of complex effect-size distributions using summary-level statistics from genome-wide association studies across 32 complex traits and implications for the future
Yan Zhang, Guanghao Qi, … Nilanjan Chatterjee·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2018
- GWIS: Genome Wide Inferred Statistics for non-linear functions of multiple phenotypes
Harold Nieuwboer, Rene Pool, … Michel G Nivard·bioRxiv·Dec 24, 2015
- Reconstructing SNP Allele and Genotype Frequencies from GWAS Summary Statistics
Zhiyu Yang, Peristera Paschou, Petros Drineas B·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 17, 2022
- A simple, consistent estimator of heritability for genome-wide association studies
Armin Schwartzman, Andrew Joseph Schork, … Wesley Kurt Thompson·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2017
- Comparing different methods of estimating GWAS heritability with a new approach using only summary statistics
Ehsan Salehi·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2023