bioRxivZoologyPreprint
Correcting for Body Size Variation in Morphometric Analysis
Abstract
Using an allometric growth model to correct for body size variation has been known for many decades to be superior to several other widely used methods such as ratios, analysis of covariance, principal components analysis, and residual analysis. However, this technique remains relatively obscure and rarely applied. We optimize the implementation of this method through a newly developed and easy-to-use R package GroupStruct and use empirical datasets to test its relative efficacy compared to several commonly used methods. Our results demonstrate the superiority of the allometric method and highlights the negative impacts of applying improper body size correction methods.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- OrganScaleR: An Open Shiny Tool for Principled Organ-Weight Inference in Mouse Physiology
Lucas Rebiffé, Laurent Gilquin, … Filipe De Vadder·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2026
- Yes, they're all individuals: Hierarchical models for repeat survey data improve estimates of tree growth and size
Theresa O’Brien, David I. Warton, Daniel S. Falster·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Nov 24, 2024
- Using relative brain size as predictor variable: serious pitfalls and solutions
S. Q. Smeele·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2022
- Estimating body volumes and surface areas of animalsfrom cross-sections
R. J. Zhao·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2023
- Accounting for body mass effects in the estimation of field metabolic rates from body acceleration
E. Byrnes, K. O. Lear, … A. C. Gleiss·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2020
- Which line to follow? The utility of different line-fitting methods to capture the mechanism of morphological scaling
A. W. Shingleton·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2017