bioRxivPhysiologyPreprint
OrganScaleR: An Open Shiny Tool for Principled Organ-Weight Inference in Mouse Physiology
Lucas RebifféiD, Laurent GilquiniD, François LeulieriD, Filipe De VadderiD
Abstract
BackgroundOrgan weights are often divided by body weight to report "relative" organ size. Yet ratios usually stay size-dependent and become misleading. We built a simple decision path for size adjustment and wrapped it in a Shiny application so physiologists can get correct answers without coding. MethodsWe reused liver and body-weight data from a mouse nutrition study for confirmatory examples in two common cases: when diet groups shared a wide body-size range, and when diet produced much smaller animals with little overlap. We compared liver-to-body-weight ratios with size-adjusted regression when the body-size overlap allowed comparisons, and with causal Bayesian mediation when it did not. The full workflow was implemented in OrganScaleR, a guided R Shiny application. ResultsThe ratio-normalized organ weight is still associated with body weight, leading to misleading comparisons. Modeling liver weight against body weight gave more cautious, size-adjusted effects when groups shared a common size range. When diets shifted body size strongly and overlap was limited, causal mediation showed that most organ differences followed the change in body weight rather than an organ-specific action. Simulations confirmed that ratios can generate false positives and biased estimates under allometric scaling, while model-based approaches remained reliable. OrganScaleR implements this decision workflow in a guided Shiny application that returns interpretable effects. ConclusionsOrganScaleR selects scale, enforces common support, and routes the analysis to size-adjusted ANCOVA or causal Bayesian mediation depending on body-weight overlap. It reports adjusted effects in original units through a point-and-click workflow, removing the statistical barrier to abandoning ratio normalization. HighlightsO_LIBody-weight ratios remain size-dependent and distort organ-weight comparisons. C_LIO_LIANCOVA at a common reference body weight removes ratio bias when groups overlap. C_LIO_LICausal mediation separates organ-specific from body-weight-mediated diet effects. C_LIO_LISimulations confirm ratios inflate false-positive rates under allometric scaling. C_LIO_LIOrganScaleR guides size adjustment without coding via a point-and-click workflow. C_LI
- organism: mouse
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
- approach: Bayesian inference
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rethinking ratio-based normalization: A guide towards model-based approaches in heart weight analysis
Manuela A. Oestereicher, Patricia da Silva‐Buttkus, … Nadine Spielmann·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2025
- Determining organ weight toxicity with Bayesian causal models: Improving on the analysis of relative organ weights
S. E. Lazic, E. Semenova, D. Williams·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2020
- Correcting for Body Size Variation in Morphometric Analysis
K. O. Chan, L. Grismer·bioRxiv·May 17, 2021
- Scaling of organ masses in mammals and birds: phylogenetic signal and implications for metabolic rate scaling
A. Antoł, J. Kozłowski·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2020
- Accounting for body mass effects in the estimation of field metabolic rates from body acceleration
E. Byrnes, K. O. Lear, … A. C. Gleiss·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2020
- Liver size is predetermined in the neonate by adding lobules at the periphery
D. Berfin Azizoglu, Karina Perez, … Roeland Nusse·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2025