GeroScienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
No effect of anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation during motor sequence learning in older people
Silke KerstensiD, Sanne BroederiD, Moran GilatiD, Evelien NackaertsiD, Britt VandendoorentiD, Alice NieuwboeriD, Jean‐Jacques Orban de XivryiD
Abstract
BackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) has previously been shown to enhance motor learning in older adults. However, findings across studies are inconsistent, which may be partly due to variability in stimulation parameters and montages across experimental protocols. ObjectiveWe aimed to replicate the effect of 1mA conventional anodal tDCS over the M1 hotspot during one session of motor sequence learning on retention (24h) compared to sham stimulation in older adults. In addition, we aimed to compare the effect of high definition (HD tDCS) versus conventional tDCS on motor sequence learning to explore if stimulation montage and according focality affects the effect sizes found. MethodsIn a pre-registered, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel study design including 52 older adults, we investigated the effects of conventional and HD tDCS on motor sequence learning in a serial reaction time task (SRTT), using a crossover design for the stimulation montage. ResultsAlthough all groups showed motor sequence learning over time, both during practice sessions (main effect of time: p < 0.0001), as well as across session (main effect of time: p < 0.0001), we observed no significant effects on learning between stimulation groups (main effect of stimulation: p = 0. 68) or montages (main effect of montage: p = 0. 66). For all groups, motor sequence learning improvements were maintained but not further enhanced after 24 hours of consolidation (HD tDCS: p = 0.64; conventional tDCS: p = 0.76; HD sham: p = 0.69; conventional sham: p = 0.57). ConclusionOur findings indicate that neither conventional nor HD tDCS enhanced motor sequence learning in older adults. To better understand potential long-term or cumulative effects, we recommend that future studies investigate the effects of repeated tDCS sessions administered throughout the motor learning process.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Age-dependent Effects of Titrating Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Intensity on Motor Sequence Learning
Amba Frese, Ruxandra Ungureanu, … Michael Andreas Nitsche·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2026
- Robust enhancement of motor sequence learning with 4mA transcranial electric stimulation
Gavin Hsu, Ahmed Duke Shereen, … Lucas C. Parra·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2022
- Timing of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at M1 Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
Hakjoo Kim, Bradley R. King, … David L. Wright·HeliyonPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation enhances long-term retention after 5 days of lower-limb motor skill learning
August Lomholt Nielsen, Lasse Jespersen, … Jesper Lundbye‐Jensen·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2026
- Neural mechanism underlying task-specific enhancement of motor learning by concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation
Ying Wang, Jixian Wang, … Yunqing Wen·Neuroscience BulletinPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2022
- Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of hMT+ Does Not Affect Motion Perception Learning
Stephanie Jade Larcombe, Christopher Kennard C, … Holly Bridge·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2019