PEPOP: new approaches to mimic non-continous epitopes
Vincent DemolombeiD, Alexandre G. de BreverniD, Liza Figueiredo FelicoriiD, Christophe NGuyen, Ricardo Andrez Machado‐de‐ÁvilaiD, Lionel Valera, Bénédicte Jardin-Watelet, Géraldine Lavigne-LissaldeiD, Aurélien LebretoniD, Franck MolinaiD, Violaine MoreauiD
Abstract
Bioinformatics methods are helpful to identify new molecules for diagnostic or therapeutic applications. For example, the use of peptides capable of mimicking binding sites has several benefits as replacing a protein difficult to produce, or toxic. Using peptides is less expensive. Peptides are easier to manipulate, and can be used as drugs. Continuous epitope predicted by bioinformatics tools are commonly used and these sequential epitopes are used as such in further experiments. Numerous discontinuous epitope predictors have been developed but only two bioinformatics tools proposed so far to predict peptide sequences: Superficial and PEPOP. PEPOP can generate series of peptide sequences that can replace continuous or discontinuous epitopes in their interaction with their cognate antibody. We have developed an improved version of PEPOP dedicated to answer to the experimentalists need for a tool able to handle proteins and to turn them into peptides. The PEPOP web site has been reorganized by peptide prediction category and is therefore better formulated to experimental designs. Since the first version of PEPOP, 32 new methods of peptide design were developed. In total, PEPOP proposes 35 methods in which 34 deal specifically with discontinuous epitopes, the most represented epitope type in nature.\n\nWe present the user-friendly, well-structured web-site of PEPOP and its validation through the use of predicted immunogenic or antigenic peptides mimicking discontinuous epitopes in different experimental ways. PEPOP proposes 35 methods of peptide design to guide experimentalists in using peptides potentially capable of replacing the cognate protein in its interaction with an Ab.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Field percentile
- top 33%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking the PEPOP methods for mimicking discontinuous epitopes
Vincent Demolombe, Alexandre G. de Brevern, … Violaine Moreau·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019
- Towards the prediction of non-peptidic epitopes
Paul F. Zierep, Randi Vita, … Stefan Günther·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2022
- Navigating the peptide sequence space in search for peptide binders with BoPep
Erik Hartman, Firdaus Samsudin, … Johan A. Malmström·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2025
- COMPUTATIONAL IDENTIFICATION OF ANTIBODY-BINDING EPITOPES FROM MIMOTOPE DATASETS
Rang Li, Sabrina Wilderotter, … Diane Joseph‐McCarthy·Frontiers in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2024
- Computational Prediction of Multiple Antigen Epitopes
Rajalakshmi Viswanathan, Moshe Carroll, … András Fiser·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2024
- Peptide Design through Binding Interface Mimicry
Xiangzhe Kong, Rui Jiao, … Jianzhu Ma·Nature Biomedical EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2025