Journal of NeurophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Intensity-dependent corticospinal facilitation by repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation: Evidence for a major contribution of group I afferents
Kaito Yoshida, Mitsuhiro NitoiD, Dai Miyazaki, Ayu Omiya, Kanau Shitara, Tadaki KosekiiD, Daisuke KudoiD, Nariyuki MuraiD, Hiromi FujiiiD, Tomofumi YamaguchiiD
Abstract
BackgroundRepetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) is increasingly used in neurorehabilitation, yet the optimal stimulation intensity for inducing corticospinal facilitation and the underlying afferent mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated the intensity-dependent effects of repetitive PMS on corticospinal excitability and single motor unit responses, and tested group I afferent contribution. MethodsHealthy participants received repetitive PMS (25 Hz; 2-s ON/2-s OFF) over the extensor carpi radialis (ECR) in a crossover design at 0.9x motor threshold (MT), 1.2xMT, and high intensity sufficient to induce maximal wrist dorsiflexion (mean 1.8xMT). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded from the ECR and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) before and during the intervention (total 15 min). The lasting effects were assessed after 9 min of high-intensity PMS for 50 min. To examine group I afferent contribution, the same high-intensity protocol was applied during upper-arm ischemia after reducing the ECR H-reflex to <10% of baseline. Sensory-motor input characteristics across stimulation intensities were compared using post-stimulus time histograms of ECR single motor unit firings during weak voluntary contraction. ResultsHigh-intensity PMS significantly increased ECR MEPs after 9 min of intervention, whereas 1.2xMT of PMS required 15 min to induce a marked effect. PMS at 0.9xMT did not induce significant MEP changes. Across all intensities, the FCR MEPs remained unaltered. ECR MEPs remained markedly elevated for up to 30 min after 9 min of high-intensity PMS. In contrast, PMS delivered during ischemia produced no MEP enhancement. The motor unit analysis revealed that suprathreshold PMS elicited an early peak in firing probability--consistent with monosynaptic Ia excitation--whose amplitude increased with stimulation intensity, whereas PMS at 0.9xMT produced no discernible peak. ConclusionsRepetitive PMS above MT facilitates corticospinal excitability in an intensity-dependent manner. Facilitation was abolished during ischemia. Together with the presence of a short-latency peak in motor unit firing via a monosynaptic pathway, this finding supports a major contribution of large-diameter muscle afferents, with a substantial Ia component, to PMS-induced corticospinal facilitation.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Repetitive suprathreshold paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation alters corticospinal excitability
Suraj Suresh, Wei‐Yeh Liao, … Nigel C. Rogasch·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2026
- Cumulative timing-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability during suprathreshold paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation
Suraj Suresh, Mana Biabani, … Nigel C. Rogasch·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2026
- Multi-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex produces short-latency corticomotor facilitation via two distinct mechanisms
Janine Kesselheim, Mitsuaki Takemi, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2022
- Cortical and spinal contributions to remote interlimb facilitation in humans
Atsushi Sasaki, Tatsuya Kato, … Kimitaka Nakazawa·bioRxiv·May 6, 2026
- Corticospinal excitability is influenced by the recent history of electrical digital stimulation: implications for the relative magnitude of short-latency afferent inhibition
Marie Trolle Bonnesen, Søren A. Fuglsang, … Lasse Christiansen·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2022
- Intensity and dose of neuromuscular electrical stimulation influence sensorimotor cortical excitability
Ainhoa Insausti-Delgado, Eduardo López‐Larraz, … Ander Ramos‐Murguialday·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2021