bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Multi-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex produces short-latency corticomotor facilitation via two distinct mechanisms
Janine KesselheimiD, Mitsuaki TakemiiD, Lasse ChristianseniD, Anke Ninija KarabanoviD, Hartwig Roman SiebneriD
Abstract
BackgroundSingle-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of the precentral hand representation (M1HAND) can elicit indirect waves in the corticospinal tract at a periodicity of ~660 Hz, called indirect or I-waves. These synchronized descending volleys are produced by transsynaptic excitation of fastconducting monosynaptic corticospinal axons in M1-HAND. Paired-pulse TMS can induce short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at inter-pulse intervals that match I-wave periodicity. ObjectiveTo examine whether short-latency corticospinal facilitation engages additional mechanisms independently of I-wave periodicity. MethodsIn 19 volunteers, one to four biphasic TMS pulses were applied to left M1-HAND with interpulse interval was adjusted to the first peak or first trough of the individual SICF curve. TMS was applied at different intensities to probe the intensity-response relationship. ResultsPairs, triplets, or quadruplets at individual peak-latency facilitated MEP amplitudes across a wide range of TMS intensities compared to single pulses. Multi-pulse TMSHAND at individual troughlatency also produced a consistent facilitation of MEP amplitude. Short-latency facilitation at trough-latency was less pronounced than short-latency facilitation at peak-latency, but the relative difference in facilitation decreased with increasing stimulus intensity. Increasing the number of pulses from two to four pulses had only a modest effect on MEP facilitation. ConclusionTwo mechanisms underly short-latency corticomotor facilitation caused by biphasic multi-pulse TMS. An intracortical mechanism is related to I-wave periodicity and engages fast-conducting direct projections to spinal motoneurons. A second corticospinal mechanism does not rely on I-wave rhythmicity and may be mediated by slower conducting indirect pyramidal tract projections from M1-HAND to spinal interneurons. The latter mechanism deserves more attention in TMS studies of the corticomotor system.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Single and paired TMS pulses engage spatially distinct corticomotor representations in human pericentral cortex
Mads Alexander Just Madsen, Lasse Christiansen, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2025
- The effect of subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation on the excitation of corticospinal volleys with different conduction times
Niclas Niemann, Patrick Wiegel, … Christian Leukel·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2016
- Cumulative timing-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability during suprathreshold paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation
Suraj Suresh, Mana Biabani, … Nigel C. Rogasch·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2026
- Modulation of motor cortex plasticity by repetitive paired-pulse TMS at late I-wave intervals is influenced by intracortical excitability
George M. Opie, Ryoki Sasaki, … John G. Semmler·Brain SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2021
- Immediate cortical responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor leg area
Mikkel Malling Beck, Marten Nuyts, … Lasse Christiansen·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026
- Not two sides of the same coin: Divergent effects of motor state on corticospinal and cortical responses to TMS of motor cortex
Mikkel Malling Beck, Lasse Christiansen, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2025