Implementing considered elements of standardisation for Time Kill Curve experiments across multiple sites: A European collaboration perspective
Marie AttwoodiD, Mark BrönstrupiD, Shampa Das, Hazel L. S. FuchsiD, Pippa Griffin, Bettina Hinkelmann, Lewis Hoare, Julien LebratiD, Sandrine MarchandiD, Derry K MerceriD, Florian Michel, A R Noel, Alina Karoline Nussbaumer-PrölliD, Markus Alexander ZeitlingeriD, Alasdair P. MacGowaniD
Abstract
SynopsisO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSThe main advantages of Time Kill Curves (TKCs) in antimicrobial drug development are the ability to track bacterial kill and regrowth over time and with varying drug concentrations. Whilst there are guideline documents in place, such as M26-A in CLSI, there remains scope for individual laboratory differences in practice. Here we evaluated several factors which potentially influenced data generated in TKCs. MethodsFirstly, E. coli ATCC 25922 was used to determine optimum sampling volume, culture vessel volume, CFU enumeration variance factors and static versus agitated cultures in a single laboratory. Secondly, a ring test comprising of TKCs was performed by six laboratories focusing on: standardised inoculum, static culture and two culture vessel sizes 10 mL and 200 {micro}L. Data analysis was performed to determine consistency within centres and between them. ResultsConsistently accurate inocula could be achieved by use of: larger sampling volumes between 100 {micro}L > 20 mL; larger culture vessels volumes (10 mL > 100 {micro}L) and higher inocula (10 8 > 1.5x10 5 CFU). Culture agitation during the TKC experiment resulted in reduced killing compared to static cultures. Reproducibility of TKCs was best between centres when they were performed in 10 mL culture vessels. There was more variability per site when performing TKC in 96 well trays. ConclusionsTechnical factors such as preparation of inocula, agitation, vessel size and enumeration of cultures are important variables in performing TKCs that need to be standardised in drug development programmes involving multiple laboratory centres.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Is there a need to implement standardisation into in vitro antimicrobial evaluation systems? A European collaboration perspective
Marie Attwood, Mark Brönstrup, … Alasdair P. MacGowan·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2026
- The impact of physiological state and environmental stress on bacterial load estimation methodologies for Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Arundhati Maitra, Marie Wijk, … Frank Kloprogge·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2024
- Development of low cost, robust and reproducible biofilm static and pharmacodynamic assays
Marie Attwood, Pippa Griffin, … Dann Turner·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2026
- Microscale assay to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration of purified compounds with limited sample volume
Shashank Kashyap, Sumit Biswas·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2026
- BashTheBug: a crowd of volunteers reproducibly and accurately measure the minimum inhibitory concentrations of 13 antitubercular drugs from photographs of 96-well broth microdilution plates.
P. W. Fowler, C. Wright, … The CRyPTIC Consortium·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2021
- Time-kill curve analysis and pharmacodynamic functions for in vitro evaluation of antimicrobials against Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Sunniva Foerster, Magnus Unemo, … Christian L Althaus·BMC MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2016