bioRxivPhysiologyPreprint
Programmed deep septal pacing for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture.
M. Jastrzebski, P. Moskal, A. Kusiak, A. Bednarek, T. Sondej, G. Kielbasa, A. Bednarski, P. Vijayaraman, D. Czarnecka
Abstract
BackgroundDuring permanent deep septal pacing, it is important to confirm left bundle branch (LBB) capture.\n\nObjectiveThe effective refractory period (ERP) of the working myocardium is different than the ERP of the LBB; we hypothesized that it should be possible to differentiate LBB capture from septal myocardial capture using programmed extra-stimulus technique.\n\nMethodsIn consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker implantation who received pacing lead in a deep septal position programmed pacing was delivered from this lead. Responses to programmed pacing were categorized on the basis of QRS morphology of the extrastimuli as: myocardial (broader QRS, often slurred), selective (narrower QRS, preceded by an isoelectric interval) or non-diagnostic (unequivocal change).\n\nResultsProgrammed deep septal pacing was performed 269 times in 143 patients; in every patient with the use of an 8-beat basic drive train of 600 ms and when possible also during supraventricular rhythm. Responses diagnostic for LBB capture were observed in 114 (79.7%) of patients. Selective LBB paced QRS was more often seen when premature beats were introduced during the intrinsic rhythm rather than after the basic drive train. The average septal-myocardial refractory period was significantly shorter than the LBB refractory period: 263.0{+/-}34.4 ms vs. 318.0{+/-}37.4 ms.\n\nConclusionsA novel maneuver for the diagnosis of LBB capture during deep septal pacing, was formulated, assessed and found as diagnostically valuable. This method, based on the differences in refractoriness between LBB and the septal myocardium is unique in enabling the visualization of components of the usually fused, non-selective LBB paced QRS complex.\n\nGraphical abstract O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY
- assay: electrophysiology
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Programmed His bundle pacing - a novel maneuver for the diagnosis of His bundle capture
M. Jastrzebski, P. Moskal, … D. Czarnecka·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2018
- Electrocardiographic characterization of non-selective His bundle pacing. Validation of novel diagnostic criteria.
M. Jastrzebski, P. Moskal, … D. Czarnecka·bioRxiv·May 8, 2019
- His bundle has shorter chronaxie than adjacent ventricular myocardium: Implications for pacemaker programming.
M. Jastrzebski, P. Moskal, … D. Czarnecka·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2019
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Preserves Mechanical Strain and Synchrony Compared to Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in an Acute Paired Preclinical Model
Emmanuel Offei, Kyoichiro Yazaki, … Muhammad S. Khan·Journal of Interventional Cardiac ElectrophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2026
- Antitachycardia Pacing is More Effective When Delivered to the Left Bundle Branch Area Compared to the Right Ventricle in a Pre-clinical Model of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia
Emmanuel Offei, Yuki Ishidoya, … Derek James Dosdall·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2025
- A cardiac pulse signal affects local field potentials recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes across clinical targets
Katherine Tourigny, Rory J. Piper, … Joram J. van Rheede·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2026