Journal of Interventional Cardiac ElectrophysiologyPhysiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Preserves Mechanical Strain and Synchrony Compared to Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in an Acute Paired Preclinical Model
Emmanuel OffeiiD, Kyoichiro YazakiiD, Yuki IshidoyaiD, Martha Sofia Ruiz Castillo, Ava Yektaeian Vaziri, Ankur ShahiD, Derek James DosdalliD, Muhammad S. KhaniD
Abstract
BackgroundLeft bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing is emerging as a promising alternative to conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing, particularly in its ability to maintain physiological ventricular activation and enhance cardiac function. However, the effect of LBBA pacing on changes to left ventricular (LV) function in paired experiments on healthy hearts, particularly in relation to myocardial strain and time to peak systolic strain difference (TPSD), which are critical indicators of LV dysfunction, remains inadequately understood. ObjectiveTo investigate how the LV myocardial strain and TPSD change in a comparative study of LBBA pacing versus conventional RV apex pacing in the same hearts under normal physiological conditions. MethodsPre-clinical canine models (n=7) were implanted with pacing leads in the LBBA and RV apex. Functional parameters were assessed under acute pacing conditions and during sinus rhythm (SR) with echocardiographic assessment. ResultsResults demonstrated that LBBA pacing significantly improved global longitudinal strain (GLS: -13{+/-}2% vs. -9{+/-}2%, p = 0.0003) and global circumferential strain (GCS: -16{+/-}3% vs. -10{+/-}4%, p = 0.0119) compared to RV apical pacing. TPSD was significantly greater with RV pacing (65{+/-}10 ms vs. 24{+/-}7 ms, p = 0.0024). Compared with SR data, LBBA pacing showed no significant changes in GLS, GCS, or TPSD. ConclusionThese findings suggest that LBBA pacing effectively preserves global myocardial strain and TPSD close to their values in SR, thereby contributing to enhanced overall LV function, as evidenced by improvements in ejection fraction, end-systolic volume, and end-diastolic volume.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Antitachycardia Pacing is More Effective When Delivered to the Left Bundle Branch Area Compared to the Right Ventricle in a Pre-clinical Model of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia
Emmanuel Offei, Yuki Ishidoya, … Derek James Dosdall·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2025
- Left Atrial Strain as a Predictor of Cardiac Dysfunction in a Murine Model of Pressure Overload
John P. Salvas, Thomas Moore‐Morris, … Pierre Sicard·Acta PhysiologicaPeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2025
- Ischemic Preconditioning and Left Ventricular Dysfunction: A Novel Mechanism & Model for Pulseless Electrical Activity
K. D. Patil, R. S. Tunin, … H. R. Halperin·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2018
- A New Mathematical Model for LVAD-Supported Ventricles: Direct Parameterization from Ramp-Test Clinical Data and Verification via Hybrid Modeling
E. Umo Abraham, A. Welch Brett, … Ethan O. Kung·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2026
- Remodeling-mediated changes in left ventricular mechanics under settings of chronic pressure overload and exercise
Francesco K. Yigamawano, Ricky Ruiz, … Tarek M. Shazly·Journal of Biomechanical EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026
- His bundle has shorter chronaxie than adjacent ventricular myocardium: Implications for pacemaker programming.
M. Jastrzebski, P. Moskal, … D. Czarnecka·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2019