Non-spatial features reduce the reliance on sustained spatial auditory attention
Lia M. Bonacci, Scott BressleriD, Barbara G. Shinn‐CunninghamiD
Abstract
Top-down spatial attention is effective at selecting a target sound from a mixture. However, non-spatial features often distinguish sources in addition to location. This study explores whether redundant non-spatial features are used to maintain selective auditory attention for a spatially defined target. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while subjects focused attention on one of three simultaneous melodies. In one experiment, subjects (n = 17) were given an auditory cue indicating both the location and pitch of the target melody. In a second experiment (n = 17 subjects), the cue only indicated target location, and we compared two conditions: one in which the pitch separation of competing melodies was large, and one in which this separation was small. In both experiments, responses evoked by onsets of events in sound streams were modulated equally as strong by attention, suggesting that the target stimuli were correctly selected regardless of the cue or pitch information available. In all cases, parietal alpha was lateralized following the cue, but prior to melody onset, indicating that subjects always initially focused attention in space. During the stimulus presentation, however, this lateralization weakened when pitch cues were strong, suggesting that strong pitch cues reduced reliance on sustained spatial attention. These results demonstrate that once a well-defined target stream at a known location is selected, top-down spatial attention is unnecessary to filter out a segregated competing stream.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Field percentile
- top 23%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Listening shapes seeing: Sustained auditory spatial attention enhances early visual-cortical processing
Yong Min Choi, Viola S. Störmer·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2026
- Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention
Yuqi Deng, Inyong Choi, … Robert Baumgartner·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2019
- Speech Stream Tracking in 2D: Attention Differentially Enhances Acoustic and Phonemic Encoding Across Spatial Planes
Varvara Kenti Kranidioti, Marc Schönwiesner·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2026
- Selective auditory attention modulates cortical responses to sound location change for speech in quiet and in babble
Erol J. Ozmeral, Katherine N. Menon·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2023
- Weak neural signatures of spatial selective auditory attention in hearing-impaired listeners
Lia M. Bonacci, Lengshi Dai, Barbara G. Shinn‐Cunningham·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2019
- Target of selective auditory attention can be robustly followed with MEG
Dovilė Kurmanavičiūtė, Hanna Kataja, … Lauri T. Parkkonen·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2023