bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
Bayesian multi-state multi-condition modeling of a protein structure based on X-ray crystallography data
Matthew HancockiD, James M. HoltoniD, James S. FraseriD, Paul D. AdamsiD, Andrej ŠaliiD
Abstract
1An atomic structure model of a protein can be computed from a diffraction pattern of its crystal. While most crystallographic studies produce a single set of atomic coordinates, the billions of protein molecules in a crystal sample many conformational modes during data collection. As a result, a "multi-state" model that depicts these conformations could reproduce the X-ray data better than a single conformation, and thus likely be more accurate. Computing such a multistate model is challenging due to a lower data-to-parameter ratio than that for single-state modeling. To address this challenge, additional information could be considered, such as X-ray datasets collected for the same system under distinct experimental conditions (eg, temperature, ligands, mutations, and pressure). Here, we develop, benchmark, and illustrate MultiXray: Bayesian multi-state multi-condition modeling for X-ray crystallography. The input information is several X-ray datasets collected under distinct conditions and a molecular mechanics force field. The model consists of an independent coordinate set for each of several states and the weight of each state under each condition. A Bayesian posterior model density quantifies the match of the model with all X-ray datasets and the force field. A sample of models is drawn from the posterior model density using biased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We benchmark MultiXray on simulated CypA X-ray data. Using a second X-ray dataset improves the Rfree from 0.105 to 0.089. We then demonstrate MultiXray on experimental temperature-dependent data for SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. Using multiple X-ray datasets improves Rfree of the PDB-deposited structure from 0.253 to 0.237. MultiXray is implemented in our open-source Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP) software, relying on integration with Phenix, thus making it easily applicable to many studies.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- qFit 3: Protein and ligand multiconformer modeling for X-ray crystallographic and single-particle cryo-EM density maps
B. T. Riley, S. A. Wankowicz, … H. van den Bedem·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2020
- Refinement of Multiconformer Ensemble Models from Multi-temperature X-ray Diffraction Data
S. Du, S. A. Wankowicz, … J. S. Fraser·bioRxiv·May 5, 2023
- Structure and ensemble refinement against SAXS data: combining MD simulations with Bayesian inference or with the maximum entropy principle
L. Chatzimagas, J. S. Hub·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2022
- Uncovering Protein Ensembles: Automated Multiconformer Model Building for X-ray Crystallography and Cryo-EM
S. A. Wankowicz, A. Ravikumar, … J. S. Fraser·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2023
- Refining conformational ensembles of flexible proteins against small-angle X-ray scattering data
F. Pesce, K. Lindorff-Larsen·bioRxiv·May 29, 2021
- Gentle and fast all-atom model refinement to cryo-EM densities via Bayes' approach
C. Blau, L. Yvonnesdotter, E. Lindahl·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2022