Biological CyberneticsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Frequency dependent responses of neuronal models to oscillatory inputs in current versus voltage clamp
Abstract
Action potential generation in neuron depends on a membrane potential threshold, and therefore on how subthreshold inputs influence this voltage. In oscillatory networks, for example, many neuron types have been shown to produce membrane potential (Vm) resonance: a maximum subthreshold response at a nonzero frequency. Resonance is usually measured by recording Vm in response to a sinusoidal current (Iapp), applied at different frequencies (f), an experimental setting known as current clamp (I-clamp). Several recent studies, however, use the voltage clamp (V-clamp) method to control Vm with a sinusoidal input at different frequencies (Vapp(f)) and measure the total membrane current (Im). The two methods obey systems of differential equations of different dimensionality and, while I-clamp provides a measure of electrical impedance (Z(f) = Vm(f)/Iapp(f)), V-clamp measures admittance (Y (f) = Im(f)/Vapp(f)). We analyze the relationship between these two measurement techniques. We show that, despite different dimensionality, in linear systems the two measures are equivalent: Z = Y-1. However, nonlinear model neurons produce different values for Z and Y-1. In particular, nonlinearities in the voltage equation produce a much larger difference between these two quantities than those in equations of recovery variables that describe activation and inactivation kinetics. Neurons are inherently nonlinear and, notably, with ionic currents that amplify resonance, the voltage clamp technique severely underestimates the current clamp response. We demonstrate this difference experimentally using the PD neurons in the crab stomatogastric ganglion. These findings are instructive for researchers who explore cellular mechanisms of neuronal oscillations.
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Field percentile
- top 49%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The voltage and spiking responses of subthreshold resonant neurons to structured and fluctuating inputs: persistence and loss of resonance and variability
Rodrigo F. O. Pena, Horacio G. Rotstein·Biological CyberneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2022
- A dynamic clamp protocol to artificially modify cell capacitance
Paul Pfeiffer, Federico José Barreda Tomás, … Susanne Schreiber·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2022
- Mechanisms of generation of membrane potential resonance in a neuron with multiple resonant ionic currents
D. M. Fox, H.-a. Tseng, … F. Nadim·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2017
- Spiking Resonances In Models With The Same Slow Resonant And Fast Amplifying Currents But Different Subthreshold Dynamic Properties
Horacio G. Rotstein·Journal of Computational NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2017
- Neuronal phase shifts differ for excitation vs. inhibition: a computer modeling study
Craig Kelley, Srdjan D. Antic, … William W. Lytton·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 23, 2023
- Distinct Mechanisms Underlie Electrical Coupling Resonance and Its Interaction with Membrane Potential Resonance
Xinping Li, Omar Itani, … Farzan Nadim A·Frontiers in Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2023