bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Separable neurocomputational mechanisms underlying multisensory learning
Saurabh BediiD, Ella CasimiroiD, Gilles de HollanderiD, Nina RaduneriD, Fritjof HelmcheniD, Silvia BremiD, Arkady KonovaloviD, Christian Carl RuffiD
Abstract
Efficient control of behavior requires multisensory learning from information distributed across senses. However, most neurocomputational studies have focused on unisensory signals. Here, we identify distinct but interacting neurocomputational mechanisms that support learning of multisensory associations. We designed a task in which behaviorally relevant information was available only from combinations of visual cues with either auditory or tactile cues. In 58 participants undergoing fMRI, we dissociated three processes: multisensory statistical learning (SL), modeled as stimulus-locked Shannon surprise; reinforcement learning (RL), modeled as feedback-locked signed reward prediction errors (RPEs); and feedback-locked unsigned RPEs (uRPEs), reflecting surprise about reward outcomes. Behaviorally, response times scaled with Shannon surprise (SL) while accuracy improved with feedback (RL). Model-based fMRI revealed dissociable but complementary networks: RPEs engaged ventral striatum, vmPFC, and left angular gyrus; surprise recruited bilateral angular gyrus, dlPFC, and precuneus; and uRPEs involved insula, dorsomedial prefrontal, and lateral frontoparietal cortices. Several of these regions extend beyond canonical learning circuits and may contribute to learning when behavior depends on information distributed across sensory modalities. All three networks were modality-general, showing comparable strength for audiovisual and visuotactile learning. Notably, left angular gyrus tracked both Shannon surprise and RPE, suggesting its potential role for integrating structural and value information. These findings indicate that the brain engages distinct but complementary systems for structure-based, reward-based, and outcomesurprise computations. By combining behavioral modeling and fMRI with a novel task design, we provide a framework for dissecting the neurocomputational architecture of multisensory learning.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The relationship between multisensory associative learning and multisensory integration
Sebastien Lauzon, Arin E. Abraham, … Ryan Andrew Stevenson·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2022
- Shared neural underpinnings of multisensory integration and trial-by-trial perceptual recalibration
Hame Park, Christoph Kayser·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2019
- Learning a new class of multisensory associations: High-density electrophysiological mapping of the temporal course of audio-visual object processing.
Tiziana Vercillo, Edward G. Freedman, … John J. Foxe·bioRxiv·Nov 15, 2021
- Neural representation of association strength and prediction error during novel symbol-speech sounds learning
Gorka Fraga González, Patrick Haller, … Silvia Brem·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2023
- The interplay between multisensory integration and perceptual decision making
Manuel R. Mercier, Céline Cappe·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 23, 2020
- Neural Correlates of Optimal Multisensory Decision Making
Han Hou, Qihao Zheng, … Yong Gu·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2018