Biochemistry and Molecular Biology EducationScientific Communication & EducationPeer-reviewed journal article
Bridging the Python Training Gap for Bioscientists in Brazil: Improvements and Challenges
Gustavo Schiavone CrestanaiD, Ubiratan da Silva BatistaiD, Michelli Inácio Gonçalves FunnicelliiD, Larissa Graciano BragaiD, Luíza ZuvanoviD, Rodolfo BizarriaiD, Rebeca Aranha Barbosa SousaiD, Pedro Henrique Narciso FerreiraiD, Flávia Vischi WinckiD, Gabriel Rodrigues Alves MargaridoiD, Alessandro M. VaraniiD, Diego Mauricio Riaño‐PachóniD, Renato SantosiD
Abstract
The rapid evolution of high-throughput technologies in biosciences has generated diverse and voluminous datasets, requiring bioscientists to develop data manipulation and analysis skills. Python, known for its versatility and powerful libraries, has become a crucial tool for managing these datasets. However, there is a significant lack of programming training for bioscientists in many countries. To address this knowledge gap among scientists in Brazil, the Brazilian Python Workshop for Biological Data was introduced several years ago, focusing on basic programming concepts and data handling techniques using popular Python libraries. Despite the progress and positive feedback from earlier editions, challenges persisted, necessitating continuous adaptation and improvement to meet the evolving needs of bioscientists.This work describes the advancements made in the 2021 and 2022 editions of the workshop and discusses new suggestions for its ongoing enhancement. Key innovations were introduced in the workshop structure and coordination, including the creation of new committees and the establishment of a code of conduct. Feedback forms were updated to enable real-time adjustments during the event, improving its overall effectiveness. The workshop also expanded its reach by increasing geographical diversity among participants. New didactic strategies, such as pair-teaching, code clubs, and the integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs), were implemented to enhance learning outcomes. Programming best practices and scientific reproducibility were emphasized through talks and hands-on activities, guided by PEP8 conventions. Furthermore, efforts to enhance scientific dissemination were intensified, with an increased presence on social media and participation in international scientific events and communication networks. Finally, we present updated recommendations for students, researchers, and educators interested in organizing and promoting similar events, building on those previously described.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Field percentile
- top 24%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Teaching Python for Data Science: Collaborative development of a modular & interactive curriculum
M. Duda, K. L. Sovacool, … B. N. Wolford·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2021
- A global perspective on bioinformatics training needs
M. D. Brazas, C. Brooksbank, … T. K. Attwood·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2017
- Leveraging a hybrid cross-disciplinary training model to accelerate global bioinformatics capacity
Tarás K. Oleksyk, Daryna Yakymenko, … Serghei Mangul·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2026
- Peer teaching as bioinformatics training strategy: incentives, challenges, and benefits.
N.-T. Rahman, C. Meyer, … R. Obaid·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2021
- Perceptions and Prospects in Life Sciences in a Heterogeneous Latin American Population
L. M. R. Ferreira, G. A. Carosso, … M. A. Mostajo Radji·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2019
- Building a local community of practice in scientific programming for Life Scientists
S. L. R. Stevens, M. Kuzak, … M. Galland·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2018