bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Read coverage as an indicator of misassembly in a short-read based genome assembly
Peipei WangiD, Fanrui MengiD, Bethany M. MooreiD, Shin‐Han ShiuiD
Abstract
Availability of genome sequences has led to significant advance in biology. With few exceptions, the great majority of existing genome assemblies are derived from short read sequencing technologies with highly uneven read coverages indicative of sequencing and assembly issues. In tomato, 0.6% (5.1 Mb) and 9.7% (79.6 Mb) of short-read based assembly had significantly higher and lower coverage compared to background, respectively. We established machine learning models capable of predicting genomic regions with variable coverages and found that high coverage regions tend to have lower simple sequence repeat but higher tandem gene densities compared to background regions. To determine if the high coverage regions were misassembled, we examined a recently available long-read based assembly and found that 27.8% (1.41 Mb) of high coverage regions were potentially mis-assembled of duplicate sequences, compared to 1.4% in background regions. In addition, using a machine learning model that can distinguish correctly and incorrectly assembled high coverage regions, we found that misassembled, high coverage regions tend to be flanked by simple sequence repeats, pseudogenes, and transposon elements. Our study provides insights on the causes of variable coverage regions and a quantitative assessment of factors contributing to misassembly when using short reads.
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Do Read Errors Matter for Genome Assembly?
Ilan Shomorony, Thomas Courtade, David Tse·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2016
- Contiguous and accurate de novo assembly of metazoan genomes with modest long read coverage
Mahul Chakraborty, James G. Baldwin-Brown, … J.J. Emerson·bioRxiv·May 19, 2016
- Assemblies of long-read metagenomes suffer from diverse errors
Florian Trigodet, Rohan Sachdeva, … A. Murat Eren·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2025
- Haplotype And Repeat Separation In Long Reads
German Tischler·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2017
- Benchmarking Framework to Catalyze Individual Human Genome Projects
Manjushri Kalpande, Apoorva Ganesh, Subhashini Srinivasan·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2025
- Genome sequence assembly evaluation using long-range sequencing data
Dengfeng Guan, Shane McCarthy, … Richard Michael Durbin·bioRxiv·May 10, 2022