henhaobio
Sign in

Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

The maturation of infant and toddler visual cortex neural activity and associations with fine motor performance

Katharina OtteniD, James Christopher EdgariD, Heather L. GreeniD, Kylie Mol, Marybeth McNamee, Emily S. KuschneriD, Mina KimiD, Song LiuiD, Hao HuangiD, Marisa NordtiD, Kerstin KonradiD, Yuhan CheniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Our understanding of how visual cortex neural processes mature during infancy and toddlerhood is limited. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), the present study investigated the development of visual evoked responses (VERs) in both cross-sectional and longitudinal samples of infants and toddlers 2 months to 3 years. Brain space analyses focused on N1m and P1m latency, as well as the N1m-to-P1m amplitude. Associations between VER measures and developmental quotient (DQ) scores in the cognitive/visual and fine motor domains were also examined. Results showed a nonlinear decrease in N1m and P1m latency as a function of age, characterized by rapid changes followed by slower progression, with the N1m latency plateauing at 6-7 months and the P1m latency plateauing at 8-9 months. The N1m-to-P1m amplitude also exhibited a non-linear decrease, with strong responses observed in younger infants ([~]2-3 months) and then a gradual decline. Associations between N1m and P1m latency and fine motor DQ scores were observed, suggesting that infants with faster visual processing may be better equipped to perform fine motor tasks. The present findings advance our understanding of the maturation of the infant visual system and highlight the relationship between the maturation of visual system and fine motor skills. HighlightsO_LIThe infant N1m and P1m latency shows a nonlinear decrease. C_LIO_LIN1m latency decreases precede P1m latency decreases. C_LIO_LIN1m-to-P1m amplitude shows a nonlinear decrease, with stronger responses in younger than older infants. C_LIO_LIN1m and P1m latency are associated with fine motor DQ. C_LI

Citations
4
FWCI
0.97
Field percentile
top 26%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISCaffarra '21Dickinson '26Schmidgen '24González '21Deliz '25Ellis '21
73% semantic matchNeuroscience
Sendy Caffarra, Sung Jun Joo, David Bloom+3 more·Human Brain Mapping·Sep 6, 2021· 21 citations