henhaobio
Sign in

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Convergent neural representations of acute nociceptive pain in healthy volunteers: A large-scale fMRI meta-analysis

Anna XuiD, Bart LarseniD, Erica B. BalleriD, James Cobb ScottiD, Vaishnavi SharmaiD, Azeez AdebimpeiD, Allan I. BasbaumiD, Robert H. DworkiniD, Robert Randolph EdwardsiD, Clifford J. WoolfiD, Simon Bodo EickhoffiD, Claudia R. EickhoffiD, Theodore Daniel SatterthwaiteiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Characterizing a reliable, pain-related neural signature is critical for translational applications. Many prior fMRI studies have examined acute pain-related brain activation in healthy participants. However, synthesizing these data to identify convergent patterns of activation can be challenging due to the heterogeneity of experimental designs and samples. To address this challenge, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of fMRI studies of stimulus-induced pain in healthy participants. Following pre-registration, two independent reviewers evaluated 4,927 abstracts returned from a search of 8 databases, with 222 fMRI experiments meeting inclusion criteria. We analyzed these experiments using Activation Likelihood Estimation with rigorous type I error control (voxel height p < 0.001, cluster p < 0.05 FWE-corrected) and found a convergent, largely bilateral pattern of pain-related activation in the secondary somatosensory cortex, insula, midcingulate cortex, and thalamus. Notably, these regions were consistently recruited regardless of stimulation technique, location of induction, and participant sex. These findings suggest a highly-conserved core set of pain-related brain areas, encouraging applications as a biomarker for novel therapeutics targeting acute pain.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIPain stimulation recruits a core set of pain-related brain regions.\nC_LIO_LIThis core set includes thalamus, SII, insula and mid-cingulate cortex.\nC_LIO_LIThese regions were recruited regardless of stimulus modality and stimulus location.\nC_LI

Citations
111
FWCI
1.91
Field percentile
top 13%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.