The Series of a Four-node Motif and Coherent Type-1 Feed-forward Loop can Provide Sensitive Detection over Arbitrary Range of Input Signal, thereby Explain Weber's Law in Higher-Order Sensory Processes, and Compute Logarithm
Abstract
Webers law states that the ratio of the smallest perceptual change in an input signal and the background signal is constant. The law is observed across the perception of weight, light intensity, and sound intensity and pitch. Conventionally, two models of perception have been proposed to explain Webers law, namely the logarithmic and the linear model. Later, another formulation of Webers law was proposed which links it with exact adaptation. This paper argues in favour of the linear model, which requires the sensory system to generate linear input-output relationship over several orders of magnitude. To this end, a four-node motif (FNM) is constructed from first principles whose series provides almost linear relationship between input signal and output over arbitrary range of input signal. Mathematical analysis into the origin of this quasi-linear relationship shows that the series of coherent type-1 feed-forward loop (C1-FFL) is able to provide perfectly linear input-output relationship over arbitrary range of input signal. FNM also reproduces the neuronal data of numerosity detection study on monkey. The series of FNM also provides a mechanism for sensitive detection over arbitrary range of input signal when the output has an upper limit. Further, the series of FNM provides a general basis for a class of bow-tie architecture where the number of receptors is much lower than the range of input signal and the "decoded output". Besides (quasi-)linear input-output relationship, another example of this class of bow-tie architecture that the series of FNM is able to produce is absorption spectra of cone opsins of humans. Further, the series of FNM and C1-FFL, respectively, can compute logarithm over arbitrary range of input signal.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 3th percentile
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Weber's law and natural inference
Jeffrey M. Beck, Ingmar Kanitscheider, … Alexandre Pouget·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2024
- A digitization theory of the Weber-Fechner law
Haengjin Choe·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2021
- A unified framework for perceived magnitude and dicriminability of sensory stimuli
Jingyang Zhou, Lyndon Duong, Eero P. Simoncelli·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2022
- Amplitude modulations of sensory responses, and deviations from Weber's Law in pulsatile evidence accumulation
Sue Ann Koay, Stephan Y. Thiberge, … David W. Tank·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2020
- Role of Lateral Inhibition on Visual Number Sense
Yiwei Zhou, Huanwen Chen, Yijun Wang·Frontiers in Computational NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2022
- Magnitude estimation reveals Poisson-like noise underlying perception
Cristina Rodríguez-Arribas, Joan López‐Moliner, Daniel Linares·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2026