A systematic structural comparison of all solved small proteins (4-6 kDa) reveals the weight of disulfide bonds in proteins' foldability
M. H. Moreira, F. C. L. Almeida, T. Domitrovic, F. L. Palhano
Abstract
Defensins are small proteins, usually ranging from 4 to 6 kDa, amphipathic, disulfide-rich, and with a small or even absent hydrophobic core. Since a hydrophobic core is generally found in globular proteins that fold in an aqueous solvent, the peculiar fold of defensins can challenge tertiary protein structure predictors. We performed a PDB-wide survey of small proteins (4-6 kDa) to understand the similarities of defensins with other small disulfide-rich proteins. We found no differences when we compared defensins with non-defensins regarding the proportion and exposition to the solvent of apolar, polar, and charged residues. Then we divided all small proteins (4-6 kDa) deposited in PDB into two groups, one group with at least one disulfide bond (bonded, defensins included) and another group without any disulfide bond (unbonded). The group of bonded proteins presented apolar residues more exposed to the solvent than the unbonded group. The ab initio algorithm for tertiary protein structure prediction Robetta was more accurate to predict unbonded than bonded proteins. Our work highlights one more layer of complexity for the tertiary protein prediction structure: small disulfide-rich proteins ability to fold even with a poor hydrophobic core.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A simple method for computationally unstructuring proteins: some findings
Alexander Powell·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2024
- Sulfur-mediated chalcogen versus hydrogen bonds in proteins: a seesaw effect in the conformational space
V. A. Adhav, S. S. Shelke, … K. Saikrishnan·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2022
- A Constant Proportion in Protein Structure
Francisco Javier Lobo-Cabrera·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2018
- Fold or flop: quality assessment of AlphaFold predictions on whole proteomes
Edoardo Sarti, Frédéric Cazals·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Protein secondary structure determines the temporal relationship between folding and disulfide formation
P. Robinson, S. Kanemura, … N. Bulleid·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2019
- Random, de novo and conserved proteins: How structure and disorder predictors perform differently
Lasse Middendorf, Lars A. Eicholt·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2023