Uninterpretable graphs at a scientific conference
Abstract
Comparing averages requires knowing sample variation, which can be shown visually using a bar graph with error bars or a box plot. Because error bars and box plots can show different measures, they must be labelled to be interpretable. Of graphs of averages shown at a scientific conference in 2020, 87.5% of graphs did not contain enough information on the slide to interpret them. The only graphs that were fully interpretable (12.5%) were bar graphs. By comparison, 92% of graphs of averages published in a journal in the same field contained enough information to interpret them. While conferences are not and should not be as stringent about data presentation as journals, that a statistical value as simple as an average are not clearly presented suggests graphs are created by rote.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Replacing bar graphs of continuous data with more informative graphics: Are we making progress?
N. Riedel, R. Schulz, … T. L. Weissgerber·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2022
- Quantifying Data Distortion in Bar Graphs in Biological Research
Teng-Jui Lin, Markita Patricia Landry·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2024
- Creating Clear and Informative Image-based Figures for Scientific Publications
Helena Klara Jambor, Alberto Antonietti, … Tracey Lynn Weissgerber·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2021
- Quantifying Misuse of Color in Biological Research
Teng-Jui Lin, Kylee Hillman, … Markita Patricia Landry·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2025
- Show the model - A Harrell plot combines a forest plot of effects and uncertainty with a dot plot of the data
Jeffrey A. Walker·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2018
- Insights on Poster Preparation Practices in Life Sciences
H. Jambor·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2020