Sign in
GenomicsJournal of Clinical Immunology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Predicting the occurrence of variants in RAG1 and RAG2

Dylan LawlessiD, Hana Lango AlleniD, James E. D. ThaventhiraniD, Flavia HodeliD, Rashida AnwariD, Jacques FellayiD, Jolan Eszter WalteriD, Sinisa SaviciD

Abstract

While widespread genome sequencing ushers in a new era of preventive medicine, the tools for predictive genomics are still lacking. Time and resource limitations mean that human diseases remain uncharacterised because of an inability to predict clinically relevant genetic variants. The structural or functional impact of a coding variant is mirrored by allele frequencies amongst the general population. Studies in protein function frequently target sites that are evolutionarily preserved. However, rare diseases are often attributable to variants in genes that are highly conserved. An immunological disorder exemplifying this challenge occurs through damaging mutations in RAG1 and RAG2. RAG deficiency presents at an early age with a distinct phenotype of life-threatening immunodeficiency or autoimmunity. Many tools exist for variant pathogenicity prediction but these cannot account for the probability of variant occurrence. We present variants in RAG1 and RAG2 proteins which are most likely to be seen clinically as disease-causing. Our method of mutation rate residue frequency builds a map of most probable mutations allowing preemptive functional analysis. We compare the accuracy of our predicted probabilities to functional measurements and provide the method for application to any monogenic disorder.\n\nFundingThis work is funded by the University of Leeds 110 Anniversary Research Scholarship and by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR, grant number RG65966). Dr. Jolan Walter has received federal funding. The authors declare no conflict of interest.\n\nAcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge the participation of all NIHR BioResource volunteers, and thank the NIHR BioResource centres and staff for their contribution. We thank the National Institute for Health Research and NHS Blood and Transplant. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.\n\nEthics statementThe study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The NIHR BioResource projects were approved by Research Ethics Committees in the UK and appropriate national ethics authorities in non-UK enrolment centres.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.