Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal ScienceMicrobiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Examining Intercage Transmission of Chlamydia muridarum: Impact of Barrier Husbandry and Cage Sanitization
Michael B Palillo, Noah MishkiniD, Mert AydıniD, Anthony J Mourino, Rodolfo J Ricart ArbonaiD, Neil S LipmaniD
Abstract
Chlamydia muridarum (Cm) has reemerged as a prevalent bacterial contaminant of academic research mouse colonies. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of husbandry and cage sanitization methods in preventing intercage transmission of Cm. To assess intercage transmission during cage change, a cage housing 2 Cm-free Swiss Webster (Tac:SW; SW) sentinel mice was placed randomly on each of 12 individually ventilated cage racks, housing cages with Cm-shedding mice, located in 1 of 2 animal holding rooms. Husbandry staff blinded to the study cages, changed all cages in the animal holding rooms weekly using microisolator cage technique. PCR testing performed 180 days post-placement confirmed all mice remained negative for Cm. To assess the effectiveness of cage sanitization to eliminate Cm, we investigated transmission of Cm to a naive Cm-free SW and NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mouse co-housed for 7 days (repeated weekly for 4 weeks) in cages assigned to 1 of 3 groups (n=10 pairs of mice/group). Cages that previously housed 2 Cm-shedding BALB/c mice were either washed in a tunnel washer (82.2{degrees}C [180{degrees}F] final rinse for an average of 16 seconds per run; n=10) with and without post-washing autoclaving (121{degrees}C for 20 minutes; n=10), or were untreated (bedding change only; n=10). Pre- and post-sanitization swabs of each cage were assayed for Cm by PCR. All pre-treatment swabs tested positive, while post-treatment swabs from all cages (excluding bedding change) tested negative. All SW and NSG mice, irrespective of group, remained negative for Cm as determined by PCR. These findings suggest that infectious Cm does not persist in untreated cages nor after mechanical washing with and without autoclaving. Collectively, these findings suggest that neither our husbandry protocols nor inadequate cage sanitization methods likely contributed to the observed prevalence of Cm in contemporary research mouse colonies.
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Field percentile
- top 32%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reemergence of the Murine Bacterial Pathogen Chlamydia muridarum in Laboratory Mouse Colonies
N. Mishkin, R. J. Ricart Arbona, … N. S. Lipman·bioRxiv·May 16, 2022
- Assessment of Antimicrobial Therapy in Eradicating Chlamydia muridarum in Research Mice: Immune Status and its Impact on Outcomes
Michael B Palillo, Sebastian E. Carrasco, … Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona·Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal SciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2024
- Chlamydia muridarum Causes Persistent Subclinical Infection and Elicits Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ and J:ARC(S) Mice Following Exposure to Shedding Mice
Noah Mishkin, Sebastian E. Carrasco, … Neil S Lipman·Comparative MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2024
- Chlamydia muridarum Infection Impacts Murine Models of Intestinal Inflammation and Cancer
Glory Leung, Sebastian E. Carrasco, … Neil S Lipman·Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Identification of collaborative cross mouse strains susceptible to chlamydial induction of hydrosalpinx
Yi Wu, Ahmed Mohamed Abdelsalam, … Guangming Zhong·Infection and ImmunityPeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2026
- Induction of transmucosal protection by oral vaccination with an attenuated Chlamydia