Transparency in Authors’ Contributions and Responsibilities to Promote Integrity in Scientific Publication
M. McNutt, M. Bradford, J. Drazen, R. B. Hanson, B. Howard, K. H. Jamieson, V. Kiermer, M. Magoulias, E. Marcus, B. K. Pope, R. Schekman, S. Swaminathan, P. Stang, I. Verma
Abstract
In keeping with the growing movement in scientific publishing toward transparency in data and methods, we argue that the names of authors accompanying journal articles should provide insight into who is responsible for which contributions, a process should exist to confirm that the list is complete, clearly articulated standards should establish whether and when the contributions of an individual justify authorship credit, and those involved in the generation of scientific knowledge should follow these best practices.\n\nTo accomplish these goals, we recommend that journals adopt common and transparent standards for authorship, outline responsibilities for corresponding authors, adopt the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy)1 methodology for attributing contributions, include this information in article metadata, and encourage authors to use the digital persistent identifier ORCID.2 Furthermore, we suggest that research institutions have regular open conversations on authorship criteria and ethics and that funding agencies adopt ORCID and accept CRediT. Scientific societies should further authorship transparency by promoting these recommendations through their meetings and publications programs.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Intellectual contributions meriting authorship:Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories
G. S. Patience, F. Galli, … D. C. Boffito·bioRxiv·May 17, 2018
- A qualitative study exploring researchers’ perspectives on authorship decision-making
L. A. Maggio, A. R. Artino, … B. C. O'Brien·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2019
- A systematic scoping review of ethics of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies
M. Hosseini, B. Gordijn, … K. L. Holmes·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2022
- Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: how open is open?
S. Serghiou, D. G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, … J. P. A. Ioannidis·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2020
- Tracking self-citations in academic publishing
A. Kacem, J. W. Flatt, P. Mayr·ScientometricsPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2020
- A decade of empirical research on research integrity: what have we (not) looked at?
N. Aubert Bonn, W. Pinxten·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2019