henhaobio
Sign in

Drug and Alcohol DependenceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

LIBR Methamphetamine and Opioid Cue Database (LIBR MOCD): Development and Validation

Hamed EkhtiariiD, Rayus KuplickiiD, Asheema Pruthi, Martin P. PaulusiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

IntroductionDrug cue reactivity (DCR) is widely used in experimental settings for both assessment and intervention. There is no validated database of pictorial cues available for methamphetamine and opioids.\n\nMethods360 images in three-groups (methamphetamine, opioid and neutral (control)) matched for their content (objects, hands, faces and actions) were selected in an initial development phase. 28 participants with a history of both methamphetamine and opioid use (37.1 {+/-} 8.11 years old, 12 female) with over six months of abstinence were asked to rate images for craving, valence, arousal, typicality and relatedness.\n\nResultsAll drug images were differentiated from neutral images. Drug related images received higher arousal and lower valence ratings compared to neutral images (craving (0-100) for neutral (11.5{+/-}21.9), opioid (87.7{+/-}18.5), and methamphetamine (88{+/-}18), arousal (1-9) for neutral (2.4{+/-}1.9), opioid (4.6{+/-}2.7), and methamphetamine (4.6{+/-}2.6), and valence (1-9) for neutral (4.8{+/-}1.3), opioid (4.4{+/-}1.9), and methamphetamine (4.4{+/-}1.8)). There is no difference between methamphetamine and opioid images in craving, arousal and valence. There is a significant positive relationship between the amount of time that participants spent on drug-related images and the craving they reported for the image. Every 10 points of craving were associated with an increased response time of 383millisecond. Three image sets were automatically selected for equivalent fMRI tasks (methamphetamine and opioids) from the database (tasks are available at github).\n\nConclusionLIBR MOCD provides a resource of validated images/tasks for future DCR studies. Additionally, researchers can select several sets of unique but equivalent images based-on their psychological/physical characteristics for multiple assessments/interventions.

Citations
33
FWCI
3.58
Field percentile
top 6%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISEkhtiari '21Lehmann '24Burgeno '23Morales '26Wunsch '26Mahdavi‐Doo '25
69% semantic matchNeuroscience
Hamed Ekhtiari, Rayus Kuplicki, Robin L. Aupperle+1 more·NeuroImage·May 19, 2021· 32 citations