henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsAnimal Behavior & CognitionPeer-reviewed journal article

Control of limb loading during active horizontal perturbations at moderate and fast trots in rats

Emanuel AndradaiD, Martin S. FischeriD, Heiko StarkiD, Dirk ArnoldiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

To understand how small animals cope with complex, unstructured, and unpredictable substrates, we analyzed the kinetics of rats (n = 10) moving at a fast and at a moderate trot over an unperturbed substrate and a substrate subjected to active horizontal perturbations. Perturbations were active single forwards or backwards displacements of an instrumented platform by amplitudes of 5mm or 10mm in 0.05s. Single leg ground reaction forces (SLGRF) were collected for unperturbed and perturbed locomotion (hindlimbs: 50/102, forelimbs: 45/130, respectively). When negotiating horizontal perturbations, rats displayed gait resetting (braking, accelerating) and non-resetting behaviors. Feedforward strategies differed between the fore- and hindlimbs. In circa 60% of the perturbed trials, forelimbs started the step in acceleration mode, while hindlimbs began the stance mostly in non-resetting mode ([~]45%). In about 50% of all perturbed steps, the impulse provided by the SLGRF displayed a change in behavior according to the expected response to the perturbation. The remaining 50% retained the feedforward strategy. Still, most perturbed trials displayed changes in SLGRF patterns that indicated passive and active reactions to platform shifts. Our results indicate that rats sensorimotor control system tunes fore- and hindlimbs differently in expectation of a perturbation. In addition, the tendon-muscle systems of the limbs are recruited to prevent leg collapse at the beginning and end of the stance. At lower speeds, spinal and/or higher center commands have enough time to re-adapt limb behavior. At higher speeds of locomotion, rats rely more on their limbs intrinsic stability and on feedforward control.

Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
21th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKreter '22Reimold '19Ho '26Li '21Mitrevica '26Saumur '20
75% semantic matchNeuroscience
Nicholas Kreter, Carter Lybbert, Keith E. Gordon+1 more·Journal of Experimental Biology·Sep 20, 2022· 9 citations