bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Genomic signatures of bottleneck and founder effects in dingoes
M. Kumar, G. Conroy, S. Ogbourne, K. Cairns, L. Borburgh, S. Subramanian
Abstract
Dingoes arrived in Australia during the mid-Holocene and are the native top-order terrestrial predator on the mainland and some offshore islands. Although dingoes subsequently spread across the continent, the initial founding population(s) could have been small. To investigate this hypothesis, we examined the potential signatures of bottlenecks and founder effects in dingoes by sequencing the whole genomes of three dingoes and also obtaining the genome data from nine additional dingoes and 56 canines, including wolves, village dogs and breed dogs, and examined the signatures of bottlenecks and founder effects. We found that the nucleotide diversity of dingoes was low, and 36% less than highly inbred breed dogs and 3.3 times lower than wolves. The number of runs of homozygosity (RoH) segments in dingoes was 1.6 to 4.7 times higher than in other canines. Whilst examining deleterious mutational load, we observed that dingoes carried elevated ratios of nonsynonymous-to-synonymous diversities, significantly higher numbers of homozygous deleterious Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs), and increased numbers of loss of function SNVs, compared to breed dogs, village dogs, and wolves. These results suggest dingoes experienced a severe bottleneck, potentially caused by the limited number of founding individuals. While many studies observe less diversity and a higher number of deleterious mutations in domesticated populations compared to their wild relatives, we observed the opposite - .i.e. wild dingoes have lower diversity and a greater number of harmful mutations than domesticated dogs. Our findings can be explained by bottlenecks and founder effects during the establishment of dingoes on mainland Australia. These findings highlight the need for conservation-based management of dingoes and need for wildlife managers to be cognisant of these findings when considering the use of lethal control measures across the landscape.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genomic consequences of isolation and inbreeding in an island dingo population
A. V. Leon-Apodaca, M. Kumar, … Z. A. Szpiech·Genome Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2024
- Domestic dog introgression in Australian dingoes: environmental drivers and evolutionary consequences
Carolina Osuna‐Mascaró, Kylie M. Cairns, … Małgorzata Pilot·Molecular EcologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2026
- Palaeogenomics-informed inferences of European dog admixture enables scalable dingo conservation
Shyamsundar Ravishankar, Nhi Chau Nguyen, … Yassine Souilmi·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2026
- Genomic analysis of dingoes identifies genomic regions under reversible selection during domestication and feralization
Shaojie Zhang, Guodong Wang, … Ya‐Ping Zhang·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2018
- Desert Dingo (Canis lupus dingo) genome provides insights into their role in the Australian ecosystem.
Sonu Yadav, Olga Dudchenko, … John William O. Ballard·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2022
- The Cuon Enigma: Genome survey and comparative genomics of the endangered Dhole (Cuon alpinus)
Bilal Habib, Pallavi Ghaskadbi, … Samrat Mondol·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2018