PLoS ONEBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
LimoRhyde2: genomic analysis of biological rhythms based on effect sizes
Abstract
Genome-scale data have revealed daily rhythms in various species and tissues. However, current methods to assess rhythmicity largely restrict their focus to quantifying statistical significance, which may not reflect biological relevance. To address this limitation, we developed a method called LimoRhyde2 (the successor to our method LimoRhyde), which focuses instead on rhythm-related effect sizes and their uncertainty. For each genomic feature, LimoRhyde2 fits a curve using a series of linear models based on periodic splines, moderates the fits using an Empirical Bayes approach called multivariate adaptive shrinkage (Mash), then uses the moderated fits to calculate rhythm statistics such as peak-to-trough amplitude. The periodic splines capture non-sinusoidal rhythmicity, while Mash uses patterns in the data to account for different fits having different levels of noise. To demonstrate LimoRhyde2s utility, we applied it to multiple circadian transcriptome datasets. Overall, LimoRhyde2 prioritized genes having high-amplitude rhythms in expression, whereas a prior method (BooteJTK) prioritized "statistically significant" genes whose amplitudes could be relatively small. Thus, quantifying effect sizes using approaches such as LimoRhyde2 has the potential to transform interpretation of genomic data related to biological rhythms.
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Field percentile
- top 22%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantifying Differential Rhythmicity based on Effect Sizes with LimoRhyde2
Dora Obodo, Amir Asiaee·bioRxiv·May 9, 2024
- LimoRhyde: a flexible approach for differential analysis of rhythmic transcriptome data
Jordan M. Singer, Jacob Hughey·Journal of Biological RhythmsPeer-reviewed·Nov 25, 2018
- Bootstrapping and Empirical Bayes Methods Improve Rhythm Detection in Sparsely Sampled Data
Alan L. Hutchison, Ravi Allada, Aaron R. Dinner·Journal of Biological RhythmsPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2018
- Methods detecting rhythmic gene expression are biologically relevant only for strong signal.
David Laloum, Marc Robinson‐Rechavi·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2020
- Correcting for Dependent P-values in Rhythm Detection
Alan L. Hutchison, Aaron R. Dinner·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2017
- Likelihood-based Tests for Detecting CircadianRhythmicity and Differential Circadian Patterns in Transcriptomic Applications
Haocheng Ding, Lingsong Meng, … Zhiguang Huo·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2021