A Comparison of Peak Callers Used for DNase-seq Data
Abstract
Genome-wide profiling of open chromatin regions using DNase I and high-throughput sequencing (DNase-seq) is an increasingly popular approach for finding and studying regulatory elements. A variety of algorithms have been developed to identify regions of open chromatin from raw sequence-tag data, which has motivated us to assess and compare their performance.\n\nIn this study, four published, publicly available peak calling algorithms used for DNase-seq data analysis (F-seq, Hotspot, MACS and ZINBA) are assessed at a range of signal thresholds on two published DNase-seq datasets for three cell types. The results were benchmarked against an independent dataset of regulatory regions derived from ENCODE in vivo transcription factor binding data for each particular cell type. The level of overlap between peak regions reported by each algorithm and this ENCODE-derived reference set was used to assess sensitivity and specificity of the algorithms.\n\nOur study suggests that F-seq has a slightly higher sensitivity than the next best algorithms. Hotspot and the ChIP-seq oriented method, MACS, both perform competitively when used with their default parameters. However the generic peak finder ZINBA appears to be less sensitive than the other three.\n\nWe also assess accuracy of each algorithm over a range of signal thresholds. In particular, we show that the accuracy of F-Seq can be considerably improved by using a threshold setting that is different from the default value.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- F-Seq2: improving the feature density based peak caller with dynamic statistics
Nanxiang Zhao, Alan P. Boyle·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2021
- LanceOtron: a deep learning peak caller for ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, and DNase-seq
Lance D. Hentges, Martin J. Sergeant, … Stephen Taylor·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2021
- Features of ChIP-seq data peak calling algorithms with good operating characteristics
Reuben Thomas, Sean Thomas, … Katherine S Pollard·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2016
- Ritornello: High fidelity control-free chip-seq peak calling
Kelly Patrick Stanton, Jiaqi Jin, … Yuval Kluger·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2015
- ChIP-AP, An Integrated ChIP-Seq Analysis Pipeline
Jeremiah Suryatenggara, Kol Jia Yong, … Mahmoud Adel Bassal·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2021
- RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls
Justin G. Chitpin, Aseel Awdeh, Theodore J. Perkins·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2019