Amygdala Self-Neuromodulation Capacity as a Window for Process-Related Network Recruitment
Guy GurevitchiD, Nitzan LubianikeriD, Taly Markovits, Ayelet Or‐BoricheviD, Haggai SharoniD, Naomi B. FineiD, Tom Fruchtman-Steinbok, Jackob Nimrod KeynaniD, Moni ShahariD, Alon FriedmaniD, Neomi SingeriD, Talma HendleriD
Abstract
Neurofeedback (NF) has emerged as a promising avenue for demonstrating process-related neuroplasticity, enabling self-regulation of brain function. NF targeting the amygdala has drawn attention for therapeutic potential in psychiatry, by potentially harnessing emotion-regulation processes. However, not all individuals respond equally to NF training, possibly due to varying self-regulation abilities. This underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms behind successful neuromodulation (i.e. capacity). This study aimed to investigate the establishment and neural correlates of neuromodulation capacity by using data from repeated sessions of Amygdala Electrical Finger Print (EFP)-NF and post-training fMRI-NF session. Results from 97 psychiatric patients and healthy participants revealed increased amygdala-EFP neuromodulation capacity over training, associated with post-training amygdala fMRI modulation-capacity and improvements in alexithymia. Individual differences in this capacity were associated with pre-training amygdala reactivity and initial neuromodulation success. Additionally, amygdala down-regulation during fMRI-NF co-modulated with other regions such as the posterior-insula and parahippocampal gyrus. This combined modulation better explained EFP-modulation capacity and improvement in alexithymia than the amygdala modulation alone, suggesting the relevance of this broader network to the gained capacity. These findings support a network-based approach for NF and highlight the need to consider individual differences in brain function and modulation capacity to optimize NF interventions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modulatory effects of dynamic fMRI-based neurofeedback on emotion regulation networks in adolescent females
Catharina Zich, Nicola Johnstone, … Kathrin Cohen Kadosh·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2020
- Alpha activity neuromodulation induced by individual alpha-based neurofeedback learning in ecological context: A double-blind randomized study
Fanny Grosselin, Audrey Breton, … Nathalie George·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2021
- Real-time functional connectivity-based neurofeedback of the DLPFC-amygdala pathway during threat-exposure attenuates anxiety
Wenyi Dong, Stefania Ferraro, … Benjamin Becker·bioRxiv·Dec 24, 2025
- Decoded EEG Neurofeedback-Guided Cognitive Reappraisal Training for Emotion Regulation
Linling Li, Xueying Gui, … Zhiguo Zhang·Cognitive NeurodynamicsPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2024
- The effects of psychiatric history and age on self-regulation of the default mode network
Stavros Skouras, Frank Scharnowski·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 16, 2019
- The elusive neural signature of emotion regulation capabilities: evidence from a large-scale consortium
Maurizio Sicorello, Jenny Zähringer, … Carmen Morawetz·NaturePeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2026