Sign in
NeuroscienceScientific Reports
Peer-reviewed journal article

Alpha activity neuromodulation induced by individual alpha-based neurofeedback learning in ecological context: A double-blind randomized study

Fanny GrosseliniD, Audrey Breton, Lydia Yahia‐CherifiD, Xi Wang, Giuseppe SpinelliiD, Laurent HuguevilleiD, Philippe FossatiiD, Yohan AttaliD, Xavier Navarro‐SuneiD, Mario CháveziD, Nathalie GeorgeiD

Abstract

The neuromodulation induced by neurofeedback training (NFT) remains a matter of debate. Investigating the modulation of brain activity specifically associated with NF requires controlling for multiple factors, such as reward, performance, congruency between task and targeted brain activity. This can be achieved using sham feedback (FB) control condition, equating all aspects of the experiment but the link between brain activity and FB. We aimed at investigating the modulation of individual alpha EEG activity induced by NFT in a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. Forty-eight healthy participants were assigned to either NF (n=25) or control (n=23) group and performed alpha upregulation training (over 12 weeks) with a wearable EEG device. Participants of the NF group received FB based on their individual alpha activity. The control group received the auditory FB of participants of the NF group. An increase of alpha activity across training sessions was observed in the NF group only (p<0.001). This neuromodulation was selective in that it was not observed for theta (4-8Hz) and low beta (13-18Hz) activities. While alpha upregulation was found in the NF group only, psychological outcome variables showed increased feeling of control, decreased anxiety level and increased relaxation feeling in both the NF and control groups, without any significant difference between groups. This is interpreted in terms of learning context and placebo effects. Our results pave the way to self-learnt, NF-based neuromodulation with light-weighted, wearable EEG systems.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
21
FWCI
1.71
Field percentile
top 17%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISNaas '19Medvedeva '23Andrade '22Hill '26Gurevitch '24Belinskaia '20
77% semantic matchNeuroscience
Adrian Naas, João Rodrigues, Jan-Philip Knirsch+1 more·PLoS ONE·Sep 4, 2019· 33 citations