CortexNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
No facilitatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on motion processing: A registered report
Grace EdwardsiD, Ryan Ruhde, Micaela B. Carroll, Chris Ian BakeriD
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have the potential to demonstrate the causal impact of targeted brain regions on specific behaviors, and to regulate or facilitate behavior in clinical applications. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is one form of transcranial electric stimulation (tES) in which an alternating current is passed between electrodes at random frequencies. High-frequency tRNS (hf-tRNS) is thought to enhance excitability and has been reported to have facilitatory effects on behavior in healthy and clinical populations. Due to the potential application of tRNS, clear demonstrations of the efficacy and replicability of stimulation are critical. Here, we focused on replicating the facilitatory effect of hf-tRNS over the human middle temporal complex (hMT+) on contralateral motion processing, initially demonstrated by Ghin et al. (2018). In this prior study, the improvement in performance was specific to global motion processing in the visual field contralateral to stimulation. The motivation to replicate this effect was reinforced by the well-supported hypothesis that hMT+ is critical for contralateral global motion processing. However, our results indicated that hf-tRNS does not improve motion discrimination. Specifically, we were unable to replicate a contralateral global motion processing facilitation following hf-tRNS to hMT+. In our within-subject controls, we also found no difference between hf-tRNS to hMT+ on contralateral global motion processing in comparison to sham stimulation, or in comparison to hf-tRNS to the forehead. While it remains possible that our lack of replication could be due to minor changes in the protocol from the original Ghin et al., study, for hf-tRNS to become a widely applied method, the modulatory effect of hf-tRNS should be robust to slight adjustments to the procedure.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 16th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation acutely lowers the response threshold of human motor circuits
Weronika Potok, Marc Bächinger, … Nicole Wenderoth·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2021
- Sparks fade with distance: The effect of electric field distribution on global motion perception using different tES techniques
Andrea Pavan, Filippo Ghin, … Gianluca Campana·CortexPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2025
- Online Transcranial Random Noise stimulation improves perception at high levels of visual white noise
Michael D. Melnick, Woon Ju Park, … Duje Tadin·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2020
- How can noise alter neurophysiology in order to improve human behaviour? A combined transcranial random noise stimulation and electroencephalography study
James G. Sheffield, Gal Raz, … Roi Cohen Kadosh·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2020
- Characterising modulatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation using the perceptual template model.
Efstathia Stephanie Gotsis, Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel, … Bruce K. Christensen·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2022
- Impact of chronic transcranial Random-Noise Stimulation (tRNS) on prefrontal cortex excitation-inhibition balance in juvenile mice.
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-León, Álvaro Sánchez‐López, … Javier Márquez‐Ruiz·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2020