Sparks fade with distance: The effect of electric field distribution on global motion perception using different tES techniques
Andrea PavaniD, Filippo GhiniD, Adriano ContilloiD, Sibel AkyüziD, Gianluca CampanaiD
Abstract
Previous evidence has shown that high frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS) decreases motion coherence thresholds when a cephalic montage (i.e., return over Cz) is used. Extracephalic montages have also been employed to modulate behavioral performance, eliminating stimulation of regions under the return electrode. In this study, we examined the effects of different transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) protocols on visual motion discrimination, placing the return electrode on the ipsilateral arm. We assessed the impact of electrode localization using hf-tRNS, anodal, cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and Sham stimulation over hMT+, a brain region involved in global motion perception. Motion direction discrimination was measured using random dot kinematograms (RDKs). Due to the increased distance between the stimulation and return electrodes in this montage, we expected a smaller reduction in motion discrimination thresholds compared to our previous study. The results suggest that increased interelectrode distance mitigates the efficacy of hf-tRNS. Additionally, no significant effects were observed with the other tES protocols tested. Our findings imply that the positioning of the two electrodes affects current flow characteristics, leading to reduced neuromodulation. These results underscore the importance of stimulation configuration, particularly the effect of interelectrode distance on performance. Given the widespread application of brain stimulation techniques in clinical and cognitive research, our results can guide future studies in carefully considering this further aspect of stimulation montage configurations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 14th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- No facilitatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on motion processing: A registered report
Grace Edwards, Ryan Ruhde, … Chris Ian Baker·CortexPeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2025
- Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities
Forouzan Farahani, Niranjan Khadka, … Mihály Vöröslakos·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2024
- Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in human and nonhuman primates
Alexander Opitz, Arnaud Falchier, … Charles Schroeder·bioRxiv·May 18, 2016
- Key Factors in the Cortical Response to Transcranial Electrical Stimulations--A Multi-Scale Modeling Study
Hyeyeon Chung, Cheolki Im, … Sung Chan Jun·Computers in Biology and MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2022
- Dose-dependent enhancement of motion direction discrimination with transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex
Olga Lucía Gamboa, Hannah Palmer, … Lawrence G. Appelbaum·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2020
- Vestibular involvement in transcranial electrical stimulation: body sway as a marker of unintended stimulation
Ilkka Laakso, Janita Nissi, Otto Kangasmaa·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Dec 22, 2024