Detecting stabilizing, directional, and disruptive patterns of anthropogenic species loss with general models of nonrandom extinction
Abstract
The selective landscape that gave rise to Earths species has shifted in the Anthropocene. Humans have accelerated extinction pressures, making efforts to detect general non-random patterns of extinction increasingly important. Much research has focused on detecting which traits make some species more likely to go extinct, such as large body size and slow reproductive rate in animals, limited dispersal in vascular plants, and narrow habitat requirements in cacti. However, general models for such non-random extinction are lacking. Here, we adapt the three general models of natural selection to classify non-random extinction as directional, disruptive, or stabilizing extinction. We develop a quantitative method for testing which general extinction model best describes observed data and apply it to the Caribbean lizard genus Leiocephalus as a case study. We surveyed the literature for recorded last occurrence for extinct and threat status for extant species. Eight species have gone extinct and ten are predicted to go extinct soon. Past extinctions in Leiocephalus showed directional extinction of large bodied species, while future-predicted extinctions exhibited a more complex extinction model similar to both random and stabilizing extinction with respect to body size. Similarly, future-predicted extinctions exhibited stabilizing extinction with respect to limb and tail lengths. Lizards with either very long or very short appendages are most likely to go extinct in the future. This shift from directional to stabilizing extinction for Leiocephalus is consistent with hunting, introduced predators, and habitat loss that first increased extinction pressure on the largest species and then extinction pressure on species that deviate from an adaptive peak centered on a generalist ground-lizard body plan. As adaptive optima shift in the Anthropocene, general models of non-random extinction are essential to developing a mature strategy for future successful conservation efforts.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Species traits predict extinction risk across the Tree of Life
F. Chichorro, F. Urbano, … P. Cardoso·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2020
- Generalist temporal niche buffers against extinction risk among non-avian tetrapods
Jacinta Guirguis, Catherine Sheard, Daniel Pincheira‐Donoso·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2025
- Modelling the probability of meeting IUCN Red List criteria to support reassessments.
E. G. Henry, L. Santini, … M. Di Marco·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2023
- Species abundance plays a dominant role in local and regional extinctions in freshwater communities and allows the identification of selective extinctions
Ryan J. Almeida, Elizabeth G. Biro, … Kevin G. Smith·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2017
- Phylogenetically and ecologically delimited species pool affect the inference of age-dependent extinction
Salatiel Gonçalves‐Neto, Tiago B. Quental·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2024
- Explaining the primate extinction crisis: predictors of extinction risk and active threats
M. J. A. Creighton, C. L. Nunn·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2022