Performance Scaling for Structural MRI Surface Parcellations: A Machine Learning Analysis in the ABCD Study
Sage HahniD, Max M. OwensiD, Dekang YuaniD, Anthony JulianoiD, Alexandra PotteriD, Hugh GaravaniD, Nicholas A. AllgaieriD
Abstract
The use of pre-defined parcellations on surface-based representations of the brain as a method for data reduction is common across neuroimaging studies. In particular, prediction-based studies typically employ parcellation-driven summaries of brain measures as input to predictive algorithms, but the choice of parcellation and its influence on performance is often ignored. Here we employed pre-processed structural magnetic resonance imaging data (sMRI) from the ABCD Study(R) to examine the relationship between 220 parcellations and out-of-sample predictive performance across 45 phenotypic measures in a large sample of 9-10-year-old children (N=9,432). Choice of Machine Learning (ML) pipeline and use of alternative multiple parcellation-based strategies were also assessed. Relative parcellation performance was dependent on the spatial resolution of the parcellation, with larger numbers of parcels (up to [~]4000) outperforming coarser parcellations, according to a power-law scaling of between 1/4 and 1/3. Performance was further influenced by the type of parcellation, ML pipeline, and general strategy, with existing literature-based parcellations, a support vector based pipeline, and ensembling across multiple parcellations, respectively, as the highest performing. These findings highlight the choice of parcellation as an important influence on downstream predictive performance, showing in some cases that switching to a higher resolution parcellation can yield a relatively large boost to performance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Field percentile
- top 36%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Impact of brain parcellation on prediction error in models of cognition and demographics
Marta Czime Litwińczuk, Nils Muhlert, … Anna M. Woollams·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jan 31, 2024
- From Intrinsic Topography to Cognitive Prediction: Benchmarking Approaches to Personalized Cortical Parcellation
Yusuf Coşku Inceler, Micha Burkhardt, … Daniel Kristanto·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2026
- DeepParcellation: a novel deep learning method for robust brain magnetic resonance imaging parcellation in older East Asians
Eun-Cheon Lim, Uk-Su Choi, … the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Frontiers in Aging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2022
- Evaluating brain parcellations using the distance controlled boundary coefficient
Da Zhi, Maedbh B. King, … Jörn Diedrichsen·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2022
- Leveraging the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study to improve behavioral prediction from neuroimaging in smaller replication samples
Carolina Makowski, Timothy T. Brown, … Anders Martin Dale·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2024
- Association versus Prediction: the impact of cortical surface smoothing and parcellation on brain age
Yashar Zeighami, Alan Charles Evans·Frontiers in Big DataPeer-reviewed·May 4, 2021