Sign in
BioinformaticsJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Peer-reviewed journal article

From Proteins to Ligands: Decoding Deep Learning Methods for Binding Affinity Prediction

Rohan GorantlaiD, Alžbeta KubincováiD, Andrea Y. WeißeiD, Antonia S. J. S. MeyiD

Abstract

Accurate in silico prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity is important in the early stages of drug discovery. Deep learning-based methods exist but have yet to overtake more conventional methods such as giga-docking largely due to their lack of generalisability. To improve generalizability we need to understand what these models learn from input protein and ligand data. We systematically investigated a sequence-based deep learning framework to assess the impact of protein and ligand encodings on predicting binding affinities for commonly used kinase data sets. The role of proteins is studied using convolutional neural network-based encodings obtained from sequences and graph neural network-based encodings enriched with structural information from contact maps. Ligand-based encodings are generated from graph-neural networks. We test different ligand perturbations by randomizing node and edge properties. For proteins we make use of 3 different protein contact generation methods (AlphaFold2, Pconsc4, and ESM-1b) and compare these with a random control. Our investigation shows that protein encodings do not substantially impact the binding predictions, with no statistically significant difference in binding affinity for KIBA in the investigated metrics (concordance index, Pearsons R Spearmans Rank, and RMSE). Significant differences are seen for ligand encodings with random ligands and random ligand node properties, suggesting a much bigger reliance on ligand data for the learning tasks. Using different ways to combine protein and ligand encodings, did not show a significant change in performance. TOC Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/551483v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@117f37forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@173427eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@126a39org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fbcc6d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
24
FWCI
3.42
Field percentile
top 6%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWu '25Ahmed '21Xia '22Zhang '23Seo '21Cheng '26
78% semantic matchBioinformatics
Ming-Hsiu Wu, Ziqian Xie, Degui Zhi·Communications Chemistry·Apr 7, 2025· 19 citations