From Proteins to Ligands: Decoding Deep Learning Methods for Binding Affinity Prediction
Rohan GorantlaiD, Alžbeta KubincováiD, Andrea Y. WeißeiD, Antonia S. J. S. MeyiD
Abstract
Accurate in silico prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity is important in the early stages of drug discovery. Deep learning-based methods exist but have yet to overtake more conventional methods such as giga-docking largely due to their lack of generalisability. To improve generalizability we need to understand what these models learn from input protein and ligand data. We systematically investigated a sequence-based deep learning framework to assess the impact of protein and ligand encodings on predicting binding affinities for commonly used kinase data sets. The role of proteins is studied using convolutional neural network-based encodings obtained from sequences and graph neural network-based encodings enriched with structural information from contact maps. Ligand-based encodings are generated from graph-neural networks. We test different ligand perturbations by randomizing node and edge properties. For proteins we make use of 3 different protein contact generation methods (AlphaFold2, Pconsc4, and ESM-1b) and compare these with a random control. Our investigation shows that protein encodings do not substantially impact the binding predictions, with no statistically significant difference in binding affinity for KIBA in the investigated metrics (concordance index, Pearsons R Spearmans Rank, and RMSE). Significant differences are seen for ligand encodings with random ligands and random ligand node properties, suggesting a much bigger reliance on ligand data for the learning tasks. Using different ways to combine protein and ligand encodings, did not show a significant change in performance. TOC Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/551483v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@117f37forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@173427eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@126a39org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fbcc6d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Folding-Docking-Affinity framework for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction
Ming-Hsiu Wu, Ziqian Xie, Degui Zhi·Communications ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2025
- DEELIG: A Deep Learning-based approach to predictprotein-ligand binding affinity.
Asad Ahmed, Bhavika Mam, Ramanathan Sowdhamini·Bioinformatics and Biology InsightsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- Leveraging Scaffold Information to Predict Protein-ligand Binding Affinity with an Empirical Graph Neural Network
Chunqiu Xia, Shihao Feng, … Hong‐Bin Shen·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2022
- PLANET: A Multi-Objective Graph Neural Network Model for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction
Xiangying Zhang, Haotian Gao, … Renxiao Wang·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2023
- Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complex using deep attention mechanism based on intermolecular interactions
Sangmin Seo, Jonghwan Choi, … Jaegyoon Ahn·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2021
- BiLSTM-Powered Bilinear Attention for Protein-Ligand Prediction
Chih‐Yang Cheng, Yi-An Chen, … Suyong Re·bioRxiv·May 13, 2026