Food ControlGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
MinION sequencing of seafood in Singapore reveals creatively labelled flatfishes, confused roe, pig DNA in squid balls, and phantom crustaceans
Jonathan K.I. HoiD, Jayanthi PuniamoorthyiD, Amrita SrivathsaniD, Rudolf MeieriD
Abstract
Food mislabelling is a growing world-wide problem that is increasingly addressed through the authentication of ingredients via techniques like mass spectrometry or DNA-sequencing. However, traditional DNA sequencing methods are slow, expensive, and require well-equipped laboratories. We here test whether these problems can be overcome through the use of Nanopore sequencing. We sequenced 92 single and 13 mixed-species samples bought in supermarkets and restaurants in Singapore which has a large and diverse seafood trade. We successfully obtained DNA barcodes for 94% and 100% of the single- and mixed-species products after correcting the numerous sequencing errors of MinION reads with a correction pipeline optimized for DNA barcodes. We find comparatively low levels of clear-cut mislabelling for single-species samples (7.6 %) while the rates are higher for mixed-species samples (38.5 %). These low rates are somewhat deceptive, however, because of the widespread use of vague common species names that do not allow for a precise assessment of the expected ingredients. With regard to the clearly mislabelled single-species products, higher-value products (e.g., prawn roe, wild-caught Atlantic salmon, halibut) are replaced with lower-value ingredients (e.g., fish roe, Pacific salmon, arrowtooth flounder) while more serious problems are observed for mixed-species samples. Cuttlefish and prawn balls repeatedly contained pig DNA and 100% of all mixed samples labelled as containing crustaceans ( crab, prawn, lobster) only yielded fish barcodes. We conclude that there is a need for more regular testing of seafood samples and suggest that due to speed and low-cost, MinION would be a good instrument for this purpose. We also emphasize the need for developing clearer labelling guidelines.
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 56
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DNA barcoding revealed a high percentage of mislabeling in commercial fish products: the first empirical survey in South Texas
Rita B. Tommasi, Sanjana M. Lamia, … Hashimul Ehsan·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2023
- MinION-based DNA barcoding of preserved and non-invasively collected wildlife samples
Adeline Seah, Marisa Lim, … Tracie A. Seimon·GenesPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2020
- Marketplace Shrimp Mislabeling in North Carolina
- A MinION-based pipeline for fast and cost-effective DNA barcoding
Amrita Srivathsan, Bilgenur Baloğlu, … Rudolf Meier·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Apr 19, 2018
- Fifty shades of white fish: DNA barcoding reveals widespread misidentification in sushi restaurants from Southern Brazil
Fernanda Almerón-Souza, Leonardo Tresoldi Gonçalves, Nelson J. R. Fagundes·bioRxiv·May 2, 2025
- A meta-review of DNA-based identification methods and mislabeling analysis of Eastern South Pacific seafood
Alan Marín·Biological ConservationPeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2026