Cell ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Similarity and strength of glomerular odor representations define neural metric of sniff-invariant discrimination time
Anindya S. BhattacharjeeiD, Sasank Konakamchi, Dmitrij Turaev, Roberto VincisiD, Daniel NunesiD, Atharva A. Dingankar, Hartwig SporsiD, Alan CarletoniD, Thomas KuneriD, Nixon M. AbrahamiD
Abstract
The olfactory environment is first represented by glomerular activity patterns in the olfactory bulb. It remained unclear, how these activity patterns intersect with sampling behavior to account for the time required to discriminate odors. Using different classes of volatile stimuli, we investigated glomerular activity patterns and sniffing behavior during olfactory decision-making. Mice discriminated monomolecular odorants and binary mixtures on a fast time scale and learned to increase their breathing frequency at a fixed latency after trial initiation, independent of odor identity. Relative to the increase in breathing frequency, monomolecular odorants were discriminated within 10-40 ms while binary mixtures required an additional 60-70 ms. Intrinsic imaging of odor-evoked glomerular activity maps in anesthetized and awake mice revealed that the Euclidean distance between glomerular patterns elicited by different odors, a measure of similarity and activation strength, was anti-correlated with discrimination time. Therefore, the similarity of glomerular patterns and their activation strengths, rather than sampling behavior, define the extent of neuronal processing required for odor discrimination, establishing a neural metric to predict olfactory discrimination time.
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: trajectory inference
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 31
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Concentration invariant odor coding
Christopher D. Wilson, Gabriela O. Serrano, … Dmitry A. Rinberg·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2017
- Rapid odorant metabolism organizes identity- and timing-based odor representations by olfactory bulb inputs and outputs
Elvis Acquah, Madison A. Herrboldt, … Matt Wachowiak·bioRxiv·Jul 7, 2026
- Human Olfactory Perception is Sensitive to Temporal Information within a Single Sniff
Yuli Wu, Kepu Chen, … Wen Zhou·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2024
- Decoding Olfactory Bulb Output: A Behavioral Assessment of Rate, Synchrony, and Respiratory Phase Coding
Xiaochen Fu, Janine Kristin Reinert, … Izumi Fukunaga·iSciencePeer-reviewed·May 26, 2025
- Mice discriminate odour source distance via sub-sniff temporal features of odour plumes
Alina Cristina Marin, Julia Jade Harris, … Tobias Ackels·bioRxiv·May 14, 2025
- Evidence that Dogs Can Use Temporal Difference in Odorant Arrival to Discriminate Odorant Mixtures
Iwan Downie, Paul Szyszka, … Timothy L. Edwards·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2026