Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning
Mark WhiteiD, Neil Edward BezodisiD, Jonathon NevilleiD, Huw D. SummersiD, Paul C. T. ReesiD
Abstract
External peak power in the countermovement jump is frequently used to monitor athlete training. The gold standard method uses force platforms, but they are unsuitable for field-based testing. However, alternatives based on jump flight time or Newtonian methods applied to inertial sensor data have not been sufficiently accurate for athlete monitoring. Instead, we developed a machine learning model based on characteristic features (functional principal components) extracted from a single body-worn accelerometer. Data were collected from 69 male and female athletes at recreational, club or national levels, who performed 696 jumps in total. We considered vertical countermovement jumps (with and without arm swing), sensor anatomical locations, machine learning models and whether to use resultant or triaxial signals. Using a novel surrogate model optimisation procedure, we obtained the lowest errors with a support vector machine when using the resultant signal from a lower back sensor in jumps without arm swing. This model had a peak power RMSE of 2.3 W{middle dot}kg-1 (5.1% of the mean), estimated using nested cross validation and supported by an independent holdout test (2.0 W{middle dot}kg-1). This error is lower than in previous studies, although it is not yet sufficiently accurate for a field-based method. Our results demonstrate that functional data representations work well in machine learning by reducing model complexity in applications where signals are aligned in time. Our optimisation procedure also was shown to be robust can be used in wider applications with low-cost, noisy objective functions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting vertical ground reaction forces from 3D accelerometry using reservoir computers leads to accurate gait event detection
Margit M. Bach, Nadia Dominici, Andreas Daffertshofer·Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2022
- Moving outside the lab: markerless motion capture accurately quantifies sagittal plane kinematics during the vertical jump
J. F. Drazan, W. T. Phillips, … J. R. Baxter·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2021
- A biomechanical comparison of the jerk, back jerk, vertical jump and jump squat.
J. Liu·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2021
- Wearables-Only Analysis of Muscle and Joint Mechanics: An EMG-Driven Approach
R. D. Gurchiek, N. Donahue, … R. McGinnis·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2021
- Increased force and elastic energy storage are not the mechanisms that improve jump performance with accentuated eccentric loading during a constrained vertical jump
E. Y.-S. Su, T. J. Carroll, … G. A. Lichtwark·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2023
- Predicting continuous ground reaction forces from accelerometers during uphill and downhill running: A recurrent neural network solution
R. S. Alcantara, W. B. Edwards, … A. M. Grabowski·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2022