Moving outside the lab: markerless motion capture accurately quantifies sagittal plane kinematics during the vertical jump
J. F. Drazan, W. T. Phillips, N. Seethapathi, T. J. Hullfish, J. R. Baxter
Abstract
Markerless motion capture using deep learning approaches have potential to revolutionize the field of biomechanics by allowing researchers to collect data outside of the laboratory environment, yet there remain questions regarding the accuracy and ease of use of these approaches. The purpose of this study was to apply a markerless motion capture approach to extract lower limb angles in the sagittal plane during the vertical jump and to evaluate agreement between the custom trained model and gold stand motion capture. We performed this study using a large open source data set (N=84) that included synchronized commercial video and gold standard motion capture. We split these data into a training set for model development (n=69) and test set to evaluate capture performance relative to gold standard motion capture using coefficient of multiple correlations (CMC) (n=15). We found very strong agreement between the custom trained markerless approach and marker-based motion capture within the test set across the entire movement (CMC>0.991, RMSE<3.22{degrees}), with at least strong CMC values across all trials for the hip (0.853 {+/-} 0.23), knee (0.963 {+/-} 0.471), and ankle (0.970 {+/-} 0.055). The strong agreement between markerless and marker-based motion capture provides evidence that markerless motion capture is a viable tool to extend data collection to outside of the laboratory. As biomechanical research struggles with representative sampling practices, markerless motion capture has potential to transform biomechanical research away from traditional laboratory settings into venues convenient to populations that are under sampled without sacrificing measurement fidelity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements
K. Song, T. J. Hullfish, … J. R. Baxter·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2023
- The Development and Evaluation of a Fully Automated Markerless Motion Capture Workflow
L. Needham, M. Evans, … S. L. Colyer·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2022
- Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture
R. M. Kanko, E. K. Laende, … K. J. Deluzio·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2020
- The Effect of Synthetic Training Data on the Performance of a Deep Learning Based Markerless Biomechanics System
T. N. Templin, T. D. Eliason, … D. P. Nicolella·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2023
- Examination of 2D frontal and sagittal markerless motion capture: Implications for 2D and 3D markerless applications
L. Wade, L. Needham, … J. Bilzon·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2023
- Evaluation of 3D markerless motion capture accuracy using OpenPose with multiple video cameras
Nobuyasu Nakano, 哲郎 櫻, … Shinsuke Yoshioka·Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2020