henhaobio
Sign in

CortexNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

On the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in mind wandering and dynamic thought

Tara RasmusseniD, Hannah L. FilmeriD, Paul Edmund DuxiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Mind wandering is a common phenomenon in our daily lives and can have both an adaptive and detrimental impact. Recently, a dynamic framework has been proposed to characterise the heterogeneity of internal thoughts, suggesting there are three distinct thought types which can change over time - freely moving, deliberately constrained, and automatically constrained (thoughts). There is very little evidence on how different types of dynamic thought map onto the brain. Previous research has applied non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to causally implicate the prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal lobule in general mind wandering. However, a more recently developed and nuanced technique, high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS), delivers more focal stimulation able to target specific brain regions. Therefore, the current study investigated the effect of anodal HD-tDCS applied to the left prefrontal and right inferior parietal cortices (with the occipital cortex included as an active control) on mind wandering, and specifically, the causal neural substrates of the three internal dynamic thought types. This was a single session study using a novel task which allows investigation into how dynamic thoughts are associated with behavioural variability and the recruitment of executive control operations across the three brain regions. Anodal stimulation to the prefrontal cortex decreased freely moving thought and anodal stimulation to the parietal lobule decreased deliberately constrained thought, with preliminary evidence for an increase in freely moving thought in the occipital cortex as well. These findings support the heterogenous nature of mind wandering, revealing that different brain regions are implicated in distinct dynamic thought types.

Citations
5
FWCI
1.21
Field percentile
top 24%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.