On the neural substrates of mind wandering and dynamic thought: A drug and brain stimulation study
Abstract
The impact of mind wandering on our daily lives ranges from diminishing productivity, to facilitating creativity and problem solving. There is evidence that distinct internal thought types can be modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), although little is known about optimal stimulation parameters or the mechanisms behind such effects. In addition, recent findings suggest changes in dopamine availability may alter the effect tDCS has on neural and behavioural outcomes. Dopaminergic functioning has also been implicated in executive processes anticorrelated with mind wandering such as attention and working memory, however the neurochemical mechanisms involved in internal thoughts are largely unknown. Here, we investigated the role of dopamine, and tDCS, on internal thought processes. Specifically, using an attentional control task, we tested whether dopamine availability (levodopa or placebo) mediated the effects of online high definition tDCS (HD-tDCS; 2mA, or sham). There was no evidence for our hypothesised effect of left prefrontal cortex HD-tDCS reducing task unrelated thought, nor freely moving thought. This failure to replicate previous HD-tDCS findings emphasises the importance of employing robust methodological practices within this field to improve confidence in the findings. However, we did find that levodopa reduced freely moving thought, relative to placebo. We also found preliminary evidence that dopamine availability may moderate the relationship between stimulation and behavioural variability performance during periods of task unrelated thought. Overall, these findings suggest that stimulation does not affect dynamic internal thought, however there is initial evidence for the potential effectiveness of targeting the dopaminergic system to reduce spontaneous internal thoughts and improve behavioural performance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Field percentile
- top 18%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DLPFC-tDCS unable to modulate mind-wandering propensity nor underlying functional or effective brain connectivity.
Sean Coulborn, Davinia Fernández‐Espejo·bioRxiv·May 26, 2022
- On the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in mind wandering and dynamic thought
Tara Rasmussen, Hannah L. Filmer, Paul Edmund Dux·CortexPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2024
- Dopamine alters the effect of brain stimulation on decision-making
Li‐Ann Leow, Anjeli Marcos, … Hannah L. Filmer·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2023
- Intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on motor learning are related to dopamine
Li‐Ann Leow, Jiaqin Jiang, … Hannah L. Filmer·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2024
- The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on behavioral and brain activity indices of visuospatial attention in intrinsic reward contexts
Atakan M. Akıl, Renáta Cserjési, … H. N. Alexander Logemann·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2023
- Not Quite All in Our Head: Intervention is a Better Predictor of tDCS Mind-Wandering Effects than Subjective Beliefs About Experimental Results
Matilda S. Gordon, Paul Edmund Dux, Hannah L. Filmer·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2021