bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Benchmarking Docking Protocols for GPCR Allosteric Modulators
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) allosteric modulators (AMs) offer significant therapeutic advantages over orthosteric drugs, yet structure-based virtual screening lacks validated protocols accounting for the conformational complexity of GPCR allosteric sites. We benchmark docking protocols using PDB experimental structures and structural ensembles derived from Gaussian accelerated Molecular Dynamics (GaMD) simulations across four Class A GPCRs (including the muscarinic M2 and M4 receptors, the {beta}2-adrenergic receptor, and the C-C chemokine receptor type 2) with four programs (Glide HTVS, AutoDock Vina, DOCK3.8, and Boltz-2) against experimentally validated modulator libraries and property-matched decoys. GaMD ensemble docking improved early AM enrichment across all four targets under at least one program. Glide ensemble docking was the only protocol to consistently improve early AM recovery across all four targets, ranking known actives almost exclusively within the top 0.5% of compounds at CCR2 and improving M2R active recovery nearly 9-fold relative to the PDB structure. GaMD free-energy landscape topology governed ensemble re-ranking strategy selection: population-skewed landscapes favored top binding energy ranking (BEmin) while flat, multi-populated landscapes favored average binding energy ranking (BEavg), and at targets with dominant low-energy states, a single GaMD cluster matched or exceeded full ensemble or PDB performance. Taking the union of top percentile hits identified by both ensemble re-ranking methods, BEmin / BEavg, maximizes chemical diversity at the earliest percentiles. Program-specific scaffold recovery biases further motivated a consensus BEmin / BEavg approach to maximize hit diversity. The Boltz-2 deep-learning program showed minimal sensitivity to GaMD templates and underperformed conventional docking, suggesting its affinity predictions complement rather than replace physics- and empirical-based docking approaches for GPCR AM screening.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Retrospective Ensemble Docking of Allosteric Modulators in an Adenosine G-Protein-Coupled Receptor
A. Bhattarai, J. Wang, Y. Miao·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2020
- Deep Learning Dynamic Allostery of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors
Hung Nguyen Do, Jinan Wang, Yinglong Miao·JACS AuPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2023
- Docking of peptides to GPCRs using a combination of CABS-dock with FlexPepDock refinement
Aleksandra Elzbieta Badaczewska-Dawid, Sebastian Kmiecik, Michał Koliński·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 8, 2020
- A benchmarking study on virtual ligand screening against homology models of human GPCRs
Victor Lim, Weina Du, … Hao Fan·Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2018
- Locating ligand binding sites in G-protein coupled receptors using combined information from docking and sequence conservation
Ashley Vidad, Stephen Macaspac, Ho Leung Ng·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2021
- GPCR-MAPS: high-resolution functional and allosteric mapping of G protein-coupled receptor activation and bias
Taylor L. Mighell, Ben Lehner·bioRxiv·May 30, 2025