Deep Learning Dynamic Allostery of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest superfamily of human membrane proteins and represent primary targets of [~]1/3 of currently marketed drugs. Allosteric modulators have emerged as more selective drug candidates compared with orthosteric agonists and antagonists. However, many X-ray and cryo-EM structures of GPCRs resolved so far exhibit negligible differences upon binding of positive and negative allosteric modulators (PAMs and NAMs). Mechanism of dynamic allosteric modulation in GPCRs remains unclear. In this work, we have systematically mapped dynamic changes in free energy landscapes of GPCRs upon binding of allosteric modulators using the Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD), Deep Learning (DL) and free energy prOfiling Workflow (GLOW). A total of 18 available high-resolution experimental structures of allosteric modulator-bound class A and B GPCRs were collected for simulations. A number of 8 computational models were generated to examine selectivity of the modulators by changing their target receptors to different subtypes. All-atom GaMD simulations were performed for a total of 66 {micro}s on 44 GPCR systems in the presence/absence of the modulator. DL and free energy calculations revealed significantly reduced conformational space of GPCRs upon modulator binding. While the modulator-free GPCRs often sampled multiple low-energy conformational states, the NAMs and PAMs confined the inactive and active agonist-G protein-bound GPCRs, respectively, to mostly only one specific conformation for signaling. Such cooperative effects were significantly reduced for binding of the selective modulators to "non-cognate" receptor subtypes in the computational models. Therefore, comprehensive DL of extensive GaMD simulations has revealed a general dynamic mechanism of GPCR allostery, which will greatly facilitate rational design of selective allosteric drugs of GPCRs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 40
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model of Receptor Dynamics Reveals AT1R Allostery and a Negative Allosteric Modulator
Hanyu Chen, Yoon Namkung, … Nagarajan Vaidehi·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2026
- Identification of ligand-specific G-protein coupled receptor states and prediction of downstream efficacy via data-driven modeling
O. Fleetwood, J. Carlsson, L. Delemotte·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021
- Benchmarking Docking Protocols for GPCR Allosteric Modulators
Tyler D. Thompson, Yinglong Miao·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2026
- Computational rewiring of allosteric pathways reprograms GPCR selective responses to ligands
- Retrospective Ensemble Docking of Allosteric Modulators in an Adenosine G-Protein-Coupled Receptor
A. Bhattarai, J. Wang, Y. Miao·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2020
- DIFFERENTIAL ACTIVATION OF G-PROTEIN SUBTYPES BY DOPAMINE D1 RECEPTOR ALLOSTERIC MODULATION
Anh Minh Nguyen, Hayato Umaoka, Hideaki Yano·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2026