CLEAR: Composition of Likelihoods for Evolve And Resequence Experiments
Abstract
Experimental evolution (EE) studies are powerful tools for observing molecular evolution \"in-action\" from populations sampled in controlled and natural environments. The advent of next generation sequencing technologies has made whole-genome and whole-population sampling possible, even for eukaryotic organisms with large genomes, and allowed us to locate the genes and variants responsible for genetic adaptation. While many computational tests have been developed for detecting regions under selection, they are mainly designed for static (single time) data, and work best when the favored allele is close to fixation.\n\nEE studies provide samples over multiple time points, underscoring the need for tools that can exploit the data. At the same time, EE studies are constrained by the limited time span since onset of selection, depending upon the generation time for the organism. This constraint impedes adaptation studies, as the population can only be evolve-and-resequenced for a small number of generations relative to the fixation time of the favored allele. Moreover, coverage in pool-sequenced experiments varies across replicates and time points, leading to heterogeneous ascertainment bias in measuring population allele frequency across different measurements.\n\nIn this article, we directly address these issues while developing tools for identifying selective sweep in pool-sequenced EE of sexual organisms and propose Composition of Likelihoods for Evolve-And-Resequence experiments (CO_SCPLOWLEARC_SCPLOW). Extensive simulations show that CO_SCPLOWLEARC_SCPLOW achieves higher power in detecting and localizing selection over a wide range of parameters. In contrast to existing methods, the CO_SCPLOWLEARC_SCPLOW statistics are robust to variation of coverage. CO_SCPLOWLEARC_SCPLOW also provides robust estimates of model parameters, including selection strength and overdominance, as byproduct of the statistical test, while being orders of magnitude faster than existing methods. Finally, we apply the CO_SCPLOWLEARC_SCPLOW statistic to data from a study of D. melanogaster adaptation to alternating temperatures and discover enrichment of genes related to \"response to heat\" and \"cold acclimation\".
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking software tools for detecting and quantifying selection in Evolve and Resequencing studies
C. Vlachos, C. Burny, … C. Schloetterer·bioRxiv·May 17, 2019
- Bait-ER: a Bayesian method to detect targets of selection in Evolve-and-Resequence experiments
C. Barata, R. Borges, C. Kosiol·Journal of Evolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2022
- Secondary evolve and re-sequencing: an experimental confirmation of putative selection targets without phenotyping
Claire Burny, Viola Nolte, … Christian Schlötterer·Genome Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2020
- Monitoring rapid evolution of plant populations at scale with Pool-Sequencing
L. Czech, Y. Peng, … M. Exposito-Alonso·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2022
- Fine mapping without phenotyping: Identification of selection targets in secondary Evolve and Resequence experiments
A. M. Langmüller, M. Dolezal, C. Schlötterer·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2021
- Optimizing the power to identify the genetic basis of complex traits with Evolve and Resequence studies
C. Vlachos, R. Kofler·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2019