bioRxivEcology
Profile likelihood-based parameter and predictive interval analysis guides model choice for ecological population dynamics
M. J. Simpson, S. A. Walker, E. N. Studerus, R. J. Murphy, S. McCue, O. Maclaren
Abstract
Calibrating mathematical models to describe ecological data provides important insight via parameter estimation that is not possible from analysing data alone. When we undertake a mathematical modelling study of ecological or biological data, we must deal with the trade-off between data availability and model complexity. Dealing with the nexus between data availability and model complexity is an ongoing challenge in mathematical modelling, particularly in mathematical biology and mathematical ecology where data collection is often not standardised, and more broad questions about model selection remain relatively open. Therefore, choosing an appropriate model almost always requires case-by-case consideration. In this work we present a straightforward approach to quantitatively explore this trade-off using a case study exploring mathematical models of coral reef regrowth after some ecological disturbance, such as damage caused by a tropical cyclone. In particular, we compare a simple single species ordinary differential equation (ODE) model approach with a more complicated two-species coupled ODE model. Univariate profile likelihood analysis suggests that the both models are practically identifiable. To provide additional insight we construct and compare approximate prediction intervals using a new parameter-wise prediction approximation, confirming both the simple and complex models perform similarly with regard to making predictions. Our approximate parameter-wise prediction interval analysis provides explicit information about how each parameter affects the predictions of each model. Comparing our approximate prediction intervals with a more rigorous and computationally expensive evaluation of the full likelihood shows that the new approximations are reasonable in this case. All algorithms and software to support this work are freely available as jupyter notebooks on GitHub so that they can be adapted to deal with any other ODE-based models.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Parameter identifiability and model selection for sigmoid population growth models
M. J. Simpson, A. Browning, … R. E. Baker·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2021
- Increasing spatial approximation complexity can degrade prediction quality in distribution models
Eric J. Ward, Sean C. Anderson·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2025
- Computationally efficient framework for diagnosing, understanding, and predicting biphasic population growth
Ryan J. Murphy, Oliver J. Maclaren, … Matthew J. Simpson·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Making predictions using poorly identified mathematical models
Matthew J. Simpson, Oliver J. Maclaren·Bulletin of Mathematical BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2024
- Choosing priors in Bayesian ecological models by simulating from the prior predictive distribution
J. S. Wesner, J. F. P. Pomeranz·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2020
- Profile-Wise Analysis: A profile likelihood-based workflow for identifiability analysis, estimation, and prediction with mechanistic mathematical models
Matthew J. Simpson, Oliver J. Maclaren·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 29, 2023