Bulletin of Mathematical BiologySystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Making predictions using poorly identified mathematical models
Abstract
Many commonly used mathematical models in the field of mathematical biology involve challenges of parameter non-identifiability. Practical non-identifiability, where the quality and quantity of data does not provide sufficiently precise parameter estimates is often encountered, even with relatively simple models. In particular, the situation where some parameters are identifiable and others are not is often encountered. In this work we apply a recent likelihood-based workflow, called Profile-Wise Analysis (PWA), to non-identifiable models for the first time. The PWA workflow addresses identifiability, parameter estimation, and prediction in a unified framework that is simple to implement and interpret. Previous implementations of the workflow have dealt with idealised identifiable problems only. In this study we illustrate how the PWA workflow can be applied to both structurally non-identifiable and practically non-identifiable models in the context of simple population growth models. Dealing with simple mathematical models allows us to present the PWA workflow in a didactic, self-contained document that can be studied together with relatively straightforward Julia code provided on GitHub. Working with simple mathematical models allows the PWA workflow prediction intervals to be compared with gold standard full likelihood prediction intervals. Together, our examples illustrate how the PWA workflow provides us with a systematic way of dealing with non-identifiability, especially compared to other approaches, such as seeking ad hoc parameter combinations, or simply setting parameter values to some arbitrary default value. Importantly, we show that the PWA workflow provides insight into the commonly-encountered situation where some parameters are identifiable and others are not, allowing us to explore how uncertainty in some parameters, and combinations of some parameters, regardless of their identifiability status, influences model predictions in a way that is insightful and interpretable.
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Profile-Wise Analysis: A profile likelihood-based workflow for identifiability analysis, estimation, and prediction with mechanistic mathematical models
Matthew J. Simpson, Oliver J. Maclaren·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 29, 2023
- Predictive power of non-identifiable models
Frederic Grabowski, Paweł Nałęcz‐Jawecki, Tomasz Lipniacki·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2023
- Data-informed model reduction for inference and prediction from non-identifiable models
Matthew J. Simpson·Journal of Theoretical BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2025
- Reducing structural non-identifiabilities in upstream bioprocess models using profile-likelihood
- Parameter identifiability and model selection for sigmoid population growth models
M. J. Simpson, A. Browning, … R. E. Baker·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2021
- Profile likelihood-based parameter and predictive interval analysis guides model choice for ecological population dynamics
M. J. Simpson, S. A. Walker, … O. Maclaren·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2022